+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: concussion protocols 'fail to prioritise safety'

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    35,285

    concussion protocols 'fail to prioritise safety'

    It’s not just the clubs, I watched most of Leeds game and as soon as player went down you could see blood but ref casually walks over smiling only then realising medics need to be called.

    He didn’t even have a word with the player who caused it which was clear to see imo

    Anyway he was bandaged up but didn’t bother with temp sub and let him him straight back in only to be subbed after around 30 mins

    Maybe be cleared by a doctor?

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/60461233

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    9,423
    If I heard right that even at the point they took him off they could have still used it as a concussion sub….which is surely self defeating if your giving teams have a choice..

  3. #3
    This is an odd one

    The Leeds player was treated for a cut following a clash of heads. So if there was any doubt that he could suffer delayed symptoms due to concussion then he should be withdrawn and substituted?

    Surely then the same criteria should apply to the Man U player because he was “ the other head”?

    He didn’t get the cut but could have got a delayed reaction.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •