I'm not sure I've ever seen a player awarded such a long, contract!
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/a...s/cvg44v08911o
Hall Of Fame
I'm not sure I've ever seen a player awarded such a long, contract!
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/a...s/cvg44v08911o
Last edited by SwalePie; 17-01-2025 at 02:42 PM. Reason: Fixed off topic prefix
Hall Of Fame
Chelsea have been handing out 7/8 year contracts for a few years.Originally Posted by Med Pie
It?s becoming more prevalent in the game? Notts fans get excited about players being on 3 year contracts, when in reality it?s the club(s) way getting around PSR or whatever it?s called as the longer term contracts offset certain costs which I?m sure someone more intelligent than me can explain.
Hall Of Fame
Amortisation.
Essentially means a club can sign 2 x players for 100m each (fee and wages) on 5 year contracts and can spread it to 40m each season. If they sell a home-grown player it's classed as pure profit so they'd only need to sell one player from the youth academy for ?40 million to break even on those transfers.
But it leads to having to panic sell youth assets like Newcastle with Anderson. Hence the bogus transfers between Everton, Villa and Newcastle last summer.
Hall Of Fame
It's basically 115 months - a subtle dig at you know what.
Hall Of Fame
Hardly a level playing field is it.?
Just another example of "creative accounting" enabling the greedy league clubs to bend the rules and take a leak on everyone else ?
Hall Of Fame
More concerning is that it shows the lack of nouse the rule makers have. It does't take a rocket surgeon to work out how to use the rules to their advantage and there is probably nothing to stop us from offering ?1m over 10 years for a player.
The worst of it is that it will rule us out of getting Haaland on a free in the next few years
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote