OT. The futures Bright, the Futures Brexit!!!

[Geoff Parkstone]

Tricky...on this particular aspect of our relationship with the EU I’ll listen to GP on the basis that he has an agricultural background and a better understanding of finance than me. He’s also become increasingly pro Johnson and anti EU so when I listen I also take that on board.
I’m not sure that the same is true of you and I’m only likely to defer to you on matters relating to engineering, being a prison officer, Forest and the attractions of Thailand...your four areas of relative expertise.
Your stance is invariably one of hostility towards anything pro EU or remotely left of centre so I take little notice of your other rants.
I’m not sure how one can ‘look confused’ on a written forum...but asking for explanation/clarification of GP’s assertion in post #7803 - which is all I did before you leapt in - doesn’t seem unreasonable...and I will listen, GP.

See response to Tricky above. However please note that this issue has been around for longer than Johnson has been alive, and so any attitude towards Johnson is unlikely to impact my perspective on the CAP! My view on Johnson hasnt changed, he's an ass - my view on the policies put in place by the civil service and tory government has probably mellowed, whilst yours has simultaneously hardened.

Furthermore my stance against the EU is no different now to what it was 5 years ago: its a curate's egg. The difference is that I have accepted that we have left and am getting on with life outside from a practical perspective. I fear you are still in the ivory towers of academia!

[ramAnag]

RA , you would make a very good current MP. You only want to listen to opinions that agree with yours. Hence the Guardian/BBC attitude.
It alarms me, that a man of your education, with over 1o years more life experiance than me, fails to grasp the injustice of the CAP.
you shouldn't even have to be told about it by anyone.
It has been banging about since the 70's, when Thatcher lost her rag and then negotiated a rebate for balance.
Nothing has changed and the French attitude as Maddy is pointing out, is that it won't.
From blocking ports, to burning lorries, the French and their partizan attitude to fairness has never gone away. Macron is the current torch barer.
My attitude to the EU is a classic realisation of what things like this represent.
You don't have to be an engineer/civil servant/rocket scientist to realise this.

So what the hell being a Forest fan/ having a property in Thailand/ working in the prison system(not an officer btw) has to do with my opinion on the facts is farcical in your response.

You see the EU as all dancing/wonderland of benefits. It isn't and never was. As Maddy is pointing out. It was and still is weighted heavily in favour of France and Germany. But the rest of us paid good money towards it.
Even you don''t need GP to tell you that, or does he spoon feed you as well?

You really do write some crap, Tricky.

I’ve just written that I take notice of GP because he knows more about agriculture and finance than I do. They are his backgrounds...they are not mine...or yours.

So far this morning you’ve banged on about Thatcher, Brown and Blair...they’re history. Look at what is happening in post Brexit Britain...it’s currently a shambles but you choose to ignore the most salient point about us having to go cap in hand to foreign workers to kick start our economy so soon after the Brexit process made the very same workers feel unwelcome.

My point about Forest, Thailand and Prisons, as you well know, was that we all have our areas of expertise and those are yours. If I wanted to know about those three things I’d give your answers credence. Where politics is concerned your prejudices...anti left, anti EU, anti migrant are so entrenched that they’ve lost all credibility.

It’s the same with everyone on here. MA has taught me something I didn’t know about the Dutch fishing industry this morning...Andy is a regular source of knowledge about music...GP knows more about both agriculture and matters financial than I ever will and Swale displays a better understanding of the workings of the EU than most, including me, imo.

Finally...I have never ever seen the EU as an ‘all dancing/wonderland of benefits’ and that assertion is the sort of typically ridiculously unfounded statement that makes arguing with you such a waste of time.
I think the EU is a deeply flawed organisation but one with huge potential for good. As I’ve said countless times before, I’d rather be part of something with such potential and work for change than be isolated on the political and financial periphery of Europe.
Coincidentally I also think the EFL is a deeply flawed organisation but look how going out on a limb against them has worked out for DCFC. Perhaps there are certain parallels there.

How’s our ‘withdrawal’ going by the way? All fine and dandy in the UK according to you is it? You choose to ignore all that is so obviously wrong in our country at the moment. It’s NOT all down to Brexit, but some of it sure as hell is, and if you want to go all the way back to Blair - another very flawed individual I accept - I think the UK under him was a great deal happier and healthier nation than it currently the case.

[Trickytreesreds]

You really do write some crap, Tricky.

I’ve just written that I take notice of GP because he knows more about agriculture and finance than I do. They are his backgrounds...they are not mine...or yours.

So far this morning you’ve banged on about Thatcher, Brown and Blair...they’re history. Look at what is happening in post Brexit Britain...it’s currently a shambles but you choose to ignore the most salient point about us having to go cap in hand to foreign workers to kick start our economy so soon after the Brexit process made the very same workers feel unwelcome.

My point about Forest, Thailand and Prisons, as you well know, was that we all have our areas of expertise and those are yours. If I wanted to know about those three things I’d give your answers credence. Where politics is concerned your prejudices...anti left, anti EU, anti migrant are so entrenched that they’ve lost all credibility.

It’s the same with everyone on here. MA has taught me something I didn’t know about the Dutch fishing industry this morning...Andy is a regular source of knowledge about music...GP knows more about both agriculture and matters financial than I ever will and Swale displays a better understanding of the workings of the EU than most, including me, imo.

Finally...I have never ever seen the EU as an ‘all dancing/wonderland of benefits’ and that assertion is the sort of typically ridiculously unfounded statement that makes arguing with you such a waste of time.
I think the EU is a deeply flawed organisation but one with huge potential for good. As I’ve said countless times before, I’d rather be part of something with such potential and work for change than be isolated on the political and financial periphery of Europe.
Coincidentally I also think the EFL is a deeply flawed organisation but look how going out on a limb against them has worked out for DCFC. Perhaps there are certain parallels there.

How’s our ‘withdrawal’ going by the way? All fine and dandy in the UK according to you is it? You choose to ignore all that is so obviously wrong in our country at the moment. It’s NOT all down to Brexit, but some of it sure as hell is, and if you want to go all the way back to Blair - another very flawed individual I accept - I think the UK under him was a great deal happier and healthier nation than it currently the case.

Wow that's a rant.

1. The topic was EU discontent in Poland
2. This was then included with the behaviour of Hungary being similar, yet parrallels with France being offered as to milking the system
3. You don't think their is a conflict and ask for an explanation.
4.Me, being a common citizen, seems to know more about a corrupt policy, than an educator? That's quite scarey really.

But rant off if you want. If GP has said the same as me, would you believe it? (he has in fact done so).
But still you rant on because my explanation makes you uncomfortable. You really do sound like Blair you know.

[ramAnag]

Wow that's a rant.

1. The topic was EU discontent in Poland
2. This was then included with the behaviour of Hungary being similar, yet parrallels with France being offered as to milking the system
3. You don't think their is a conflict and ask for an explanation.
4.Me, being a common citizen, seems to know more about a corrupt policy, than an educator? That's quite scarey really.

But rant off if you want. If GP has said the same as me, would you believe it? (he has in fact done so).
But still you rant on because my explanation makes you uncomfortable. You really do sound like Blair you know.

I think you and I have different concepts of the word ‘rant’.
It was a clarification...because you clearly hadn’t understood my stance and so, as ever, sought to make one up.
Your topic may have been ‘discontent in Poland’...I have never mentioned Poland and simply politely asked GP to explain his point about France.
He still hasn’t really, but doubtless will. In the meantime you, as ever, have avoided issues you’re uncomfortable with and tried to make things personal.

[Geoff Parkstone]

see 7816 and 7817, coupled with MA's post on the matter and (in parts) Tricky's points. Im not sure how much more explanation is needed, short od writing a series of books.

Perhaps just do a search on google for details of the operations of the CAP and France (and indeed to a lesser extent ItalY)

[ramAnag]

see 7816 and 7817, coupled with MA's post on the matter and (in parts) Tricky's points. Im not sure how much more explanation is needed, short od writing a series of books.

Perhaps just do a search on google for details of the operations of the CAP and France (and indeed to a lesser extent ItalY)

With respect GP, you referred to France as a ‘role model in milking the system’.
Rambling on a bit about ‘rewilding’, comparing aspects of French agriculture to the ‘Good Life’ and reiterating that the EU originated out of a desire to give France control of European food production isn’t really providing evidence of your claim.
There needs to be rather more ‘flesh on the bones’ of your argument than that imo.
MA has his opinion which, like yours, I respect. I’m not even saying you’re wrong, I just don’t know...but you made a big statement which has yet to be properly backed up.

There are after all 27 countries remaining in the EU. Why would the others, amongst whom are some big ‘players’, be so happy to ‘join up’ for the benefit of France (and Germany) and why then is it just a proportion of the UK electorate and political class who seem to take such exception to the EU?

[Geoff Parkstone]

As noted above, I am not your teacher - there is plenty of information on the internet on the subject, and I know you hate it when someone posts links!! So research yourself!

[ramAnag]

As noted above, I am not your teacher - there is plenty of information on the internet on the subject, and I know you hate it when someone posts links!! So research yourself!

Lol...you sound increasingly like Tricky.
I actually hate it when people use this forum to post biased links particularly in the form of extreme political nonsense.
I value your opinion on agriculture and finance and you made a simple but big statement on the two of them in the context of France and the EU but now decline the opportunity to back it up and clarify.
Nuff said.

[Geoff Parkstone]

https://www.authoritas.com/blog/are-google-search-results-biased/

[ramAnag]

Hmmm...interesting. Not quite sure of your point, but I am quite sure you understood what I was referring to by my dislike of ‘biased links in the form of extreme political nonsense’ being reproduced on here.
Doesn’t get us much further regarding your French claim.

[Geoff Parkstone]

Nor will we, told you that you wouldn't believe me in the first post. You didn't. Predictible.

[Trickytreesreds]

https://www.authoritas.com/blog/are-...esults-biased/

You're wasting our time GP. Unless you quote the Guardian/BBC/Guy Verhofstadt, he'll dismiss it as right wing propaganda.
You can't educate pork.

[Andy_Faber]

You can't educate pork.

I intend to use that extensively tomorrow. But what does it mean?

[Trickytreesreds]

Just to show willing and not dismiss the feeble minded.
Here it is broken down.

I can't be fairer than that. It even eats itself internally. I'm a metal man and even I get it. What's hard to understand?

https://www.arc2020.eu/agriculture-atlas-biggest-beneficiary/

[Trickytreesreds]

I intend to use that extensively tomorrow. But what does it mean?

An old saying believed to have originated in the English west country. Meaning that the person being referred to is as incapable of understanding your point as is a piece of meat.