Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

OT. The futures Bright, the Futures Brexit!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Andy_Faber View Post

    A former colleague of Mrs Fs and owner of a pretty big engineering works that employs a real ‘league of nations’ workforce, shared a phrase that he has used through his life and originates in his homeland Iraq which to me sums it up; ‘you are welcome in my house but don’t **** on my carpet’
    I think we’d all agree with that sentiment AF...and I’ve certainly used it in both a classroom and a whole school situation. It’s really only an extension of ‘don’t **** on your own doorstep’ but you choose to apply it to immigrants.
    There are, of course, badly behaved migrants, no one is denying it, but there are also plenty of equally badly behaved ‘home grown’ folk. The point, or one of them that you, and more particularly TTR choose to overlook, is quite how desperate people have to be to up sticks, leave their family and cross busy shipping lanes (the Mediterranean and the Channel) in sub standard vessels.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by ramAnag View Post
      I think we’d all agree with that sentiment AF...and I’ve certainly used it in both a classroom and a whole school situation. It’s really only an extension of ‘don’t **** on your own doorstep’ but you choose to apply it to immigrants.
      There are, of course, badly behaved migrants, no one is denying it, but there are also plenty of equally badly behaved ‘home grown’ folk. The point, or one of them that you, and more particularly TTR choose to overlook, is quite how desperate people have to be to up sticks, leave their family and cross busy shipping lanes (the Mediterranean and the Channel) in sub standard vessels.
      I do not over look them RA, but they are our vermin we have to deal with. That is the whole point, criminality is on the rise no matter what. But to increase its impact by reckless decisions is just plain stupidity.
      But to overturn your comment, the crime in Europe has doubled since these "migrants/refugees" decided they want to be part of Europe. Violent *** crimes in particular.
      The bleeding heart stories, like sub standard vessels in shipping lanes, don't wash with me.
      The flood in the boats are 85% male between 18-30.
      They were in no danger in Greece/Italy/spain/France/Belgium, yet play the poor me card all the same.
      The ones laughing at this are the traffickers.
      The irony being that many of these traffickers are former migrants themselves.
      The only way to stop this abomination, is to cut the route dead. All returned immediately, with no asylum application. Once that happens, it will dry up. Applications in European countries should be done at places like embassies. None of them have come direct from their point of flight.

      I never got your ccomment on this trio either.
      The first one being in France 6 years, yet now thinks he can upsticks for the UK.
      UNACCEPTABLE.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by ramAnag View Post
        No apology needed, Tricky.

        No idea at all how Swale’s comment was racist.

        It’s amazing how selective you/we can be. GP’s first comment was tasteless, though darkly funny imo, Swale’s was amusing and infinitely less offensive than some of the things you’ve said on here...again imo. Yet you only find fault with the latter.

        Anyway, hope the op was a success, that you feel better soon and that Forest break their duck tomorrow...no actually, scrub that last one!
        His comment wasn't racist RA. He was implying racism on mybehalf as normal, even though I've said nothing.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Andy_Faber View Post
          Pretty much as I guessed, and the core of 1, 2 and 3 form the basis of what pretty much everyone I know thinks.

          A former colleague of Mrs Fs and owner of a pretty big engineering works that employs a real ‘league of nations’ workforce, shared a phrase that he has used through his life and originates in his homeland Iraq which to me sums it up; ‘you are welcome in my house but don’t **** on my carpet’
          Interesting version of what I have heard of as "you are welcome in my house but dont **** my daughter!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Geoff Parkstone View Post
            Interesting version of what I have heard of as "you are welcome in my house but dont **** my daughter!
            ...especially not on the carpet!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by ramAnag View Post
              The point, or one of them that you, and more particularly TTR choose to overlook, is quite how desperate people have to be to up sticks, leave their family and cross busy shipping lanes (the Mediterranean and the Channel) in sub standard vessels.
              I do not overlook that point, I very specifically ignore it. Economic migrants are not wanted (unless invited) and these people actually make it far more difficult for genuine asylum seekers to gain traction and support. Those seeking personal betterment harden the hearts of the host populations against those in genuine need.

              As I think I have said before, to your horror and disapproval, I do not care if these nomadic scroungers do end up at the bottom of the channel when trying to illegally enter the country. If they have a good case for asylum they do not need to use illegal methods

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Geoff Parkstone View Post
                I do not overlook that point, I very specifically ignore it. Economic migrants are not wanted (unless invited) and these people actually make it far more difficult for genuine asylum seekers to gain traction and support. Those seeking personal betterment harden the hearts of the host populations against those in genuine need.

                As I think I have said before, to your horror and disapproval, I do not care if these nomadic scroungers do end up at the bottom of the channel when trying to illegally enter the country. If they have a good case for asylum they do not need to use illegal methods
                Well there we’ll have to differ. You’ll think I’m a naive idealist...but I’d prefer a world where there is some joined up thought from World governments and leaders as regards how to deal with the dispossessed and the poor.
                I know it’ll never fit with your ‘survival of the fittest’ mentality, but perhaps we’d both do well to remember that our comparative good fortune owes so much to the security of our upbringings, relative intelligence and simply being born into the ‘First World’.
                Others don’t share that same good fortune/accident of birth through no fault of their own.

                P.S. Isn’t the wealthiest country in the West, possibly the World, made up of ‘economic migrants’?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by ramAnag View Post
                  I think we’d all agree with that sentiment AF...and I’ve certainly used it in both a classroom and a whole school situation. It’s really only an extension of ‘don’t **** on your own doorstep’ but you choose to apply it to immigrants.
                  There are, of course, badly behaved migrants, no one is denying it, but there are also plenty of equally badly behaved ‘home grown’ folk. The point, or one of them that you, and more particularly TTR choose to overlook, is quite how desperate people have to be to up sticks, leave their family and cross busy shipping lanes (the Mediterranean and the Channel) in sub standard vessels.
                  I'm a bit less less hard over on this than GP but there HAS to be control, and it appears that more effort is put into justifying the continuing residence of those who manage to make the trip, by various do-gooders (think Nigel Farage and then think of someone as much his opposite as possible) and lawyers with no interest in the souls involved but lots in amassing wealth, than into exercising that control.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Andy_Faber View Post
                    I'm a bit less less hard over on this than GP but there HAS to be control, and it appears that more effort is put into justifying the continuing residence of those who manage to make the trip, by various do-gooders (think Nigel Farage and then think of someone as much his opposite as possible) and lawyers with no interest in the souls involved but lots in amassing wealth, than into exercising that control.
                    Of course there has to ‘be control’. Has anyone said otherwise? That’s exactly why I’ve spoken of ‘joined up thought from World governments and leaders’.
                    I don’t know the answer any more than any of us...but can we really end up uncaringly consigning people to the bottom of the seas and shrugging our shoulders at the plight of those born into less ‘favoured’ parts of the World than ourselves?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by ramAnag View Post

                      P.S. Isn’t the wealthiest country in the West, possibly the World, made up of ‘economic migrants’?
                      Totally different and you know it.
                      The USA didn't even exist at the height of it.
                      A land (stolen from Natives) ripe for colonisation, with untold space/ riches/ resouces.
                      Is it easy to get in the USA now as an economic migrant?

                      No it bloody well isn't, as central America will testify.
                      Contrary to popular myths, space isn't infinate. Many countries around the world have put the shutters down, to protect what they have.
                      Help comes in many forms. But an open door, is not a realistic option.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by ramAnag View Post
                        Well there we’ll have to differ. You’ll think I’m a naive idealist...but I’d prefer a world where there is some joined up thought from World governments and leaders as regards how to deal with the dispossessed and the poor.
                        I know it’ll never fit with your ‘survival of the fittest’ mentality, but perhaps we’d both do well to remember that our comparative good fortune owes so much to the security of our upbringings, relative intelligence and simply being born into the ‘First World’.
                        Others don’t share that same good fortune/accident of birth through no fault of their own.

                        P.S. Isn’t the wealthiest country in the West, possibly the World, made up of ‘economic migrants’?
                        As of a couple of years ago, and defining wealthiest in terms of GDP per capita, that would be Leichtenstein (false teeth) Monaco or Luxemburg then. Curiously not a place of refuge of most economic migrants who seem to stroll past these countries and aremore attracted by the UK benefit system: which may explain whey we are but 37th on the league table. The history of these three wealthiest countries do not seem littered with economic migration from poorer countries, although doubtless there have been conquests here and there along their evolution.

                        The next western countries on the "rich list" are, somewhat surprisingly Ireland, followed by Switzerland (banking) San Marino and Norway (oil). the top 10 is rounded out by three off shore banking havens - Isle of Man, Bermuda and the Caymans, one of which I can confirm did attract an economic migrant in the form of me. An impoverished newly qualified accountant in search of tax free salary!

                        I suspect you incorrectly obliquely try to refer to the USA, number 15 on the list

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Trickytreesreds View Post

                          Help comes in many forms. But an open door, is not a realistic option.
                          ...and where have I said it doesn’t...or that an ‘open door’ is a ‘realistic option’?

                          Read what I’ve said not what you want me to have said.

                          P.S. Clearly I bow to your superior, if rather pedantic, knowledge of wealth and riches...GP.
                          Last edited by ramAnag; 20-08-2021, 05:27 PM.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Trickytreesreds View Post
                            Totally different and you know it.
                            The USA didn't even exist at the height of it.
                            A land (stolen from Natives) ripe for colonisation, with untold space/ riches/ resouces.
                            Is it easy to get in the USA now as an economic migrant?

                            No it bloody well isn't, as central America will testify.
                            Contrary to popular myths, space isn't infinate. Many countries around the world have put the shutters down, to protect what they have.
                            Help comes in many forms. But an open door, is not a realistic option.
                            Economic migrants, crossing open stretches of dangerous water? mm one would rather think that people would apply a bit of logic and consider why these people are desperate!

                            Its also a completely false point o go o about there isn't enough space, our services can't cope we don't ahve enough houses etc. etc.

                            If the population growth was as a result of a booming birth rate by those resident in the UK - neither Thicky or anyone else would be making a fuss about it! Its a s simple as that, its only because these are foreign migrants that these protectionist attitudes are to the fore, natural instinct maybe but actually ignoring reality.

                            One we ahve a declining birth rate - the population is getting older, despite technology there are not enough people to do the jobs required, plus who the **** is going to be paying the taxes to foot the bill for pensions, care, healthcare and other services as the working population dwindles?

                            The Uk might be an island, but as has been shown we are not able to isolate ourselves from what happens in other parts of the world, I get that parochial people don't understand this concept, however its fact people are mobile and migration whether to better themselves economically or to improve their actual chances of living ahve been going on for thousands of years and being "Canute" like and trying to slam the door shut is not going to work.

                            The actual answer is to have a clear route by which people can legally apply for immigration and to recognise those that are legitimately needing asylum.

                            We also need to understand that cutting the overseas aid budget is only to going to make things worse, and now perhaps being rather more proactive in getting vaccines to other parts of the world wouldn't be a bad thing.

                            Comment


                            • It's always our fault isn't it?

                              Germany threw hundreds of thousands of doses in the bin, whilst the EU pissed about with its political bickering.
                              Astra Zeneca produced at cost for everyone. But that doesn't go down well in the EU.

                              The UK does more than most, but it's still our fault.
                              Foreign Secretary announces the UK will begin to deliver 9 million COVID-19 vaccines around the world to help tackle the pandemic.


                              The asylum comment is thr one that makes me choke on my tea.
                              All the way from Iraq/Iran/Afghanistan/India/Pakistan/Sudan/North Africa/Middle Africa. Through country after country, refusing to apply for asylum in these terrible European countries. Yet a clear route for IMMIGRATION is needed?
                              Well if we are talking IMMIGRATION, there is one.
                              Unfortunately, 99% of them know they won't get in for that, so the asylum route is hijacked.
                              I'm 18/ come from Kabul/ the Talliban killed my family etc. Says the 35 year old, goat herder from Islamabad.
                              ID is tossed away and they conduct an interview built on lies.
                              This makes genuine asylum seekers suffer. The noted absense of women/children/old/infirm, is there for all to see.
                              Yet still we get suckered in.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by ramAnag View Post
                                ...and where have I said it doesn’t...or that an ‘open door’ is a ‘realistic option’?

                                Read what I’ve said not what you want me to have said.

                                P.S. Clearly I bow to your superior, if rather pedantic, knowledge of wealth and riches...GP.
                                What you said or sympathise with, is the illegal migrants getting onto UK soil. That in effect is supporting an open door policy.
                                I actually admire your sunshine and rainbows view of the world. Unfortunately, history teaches us, that being soft and easy ends up very badly in the long run.
                                Allow yourself to be used/manipulated, and people/governments/countries
                                will do so.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X