Marinakis no longer in charge of Forest

[macstheman]

Andy wrote 'a damp, misty BBG', ah happy memories!
Good old Leys Malleable Castings!

[Andy_Faber]

Andy wrote 'a damp, misty BBG', ah happy memories!
Good old Leys Malleable Castings!

Not to mention The Ewart Chainbelt Co and 1,000 gallons of green paint

[ramAnag]

Really? Derby county have done it before to a commentator. MUFC under Ferguson banned the BBC for ages.
Neville is supposed to commentate on the football, not go on live tv telling a manager to resign. He's as bad as Lineker with his opinions and expects no come back. He got one and didn't like it. Karma

What Derby and MUFC did years ago isn’t really relevant. I didn’t say it hadn’t happened before or that Neville was right (or wrong) in what he said. Neither do his actions and those of Gary Lineker have much in common.
It’s just my opinion that it’s a bit OTT to ban a pundit - and he’s more of a summariser than a ‘commentator’ anyway - because you don’t like what he said.

[Trickytreesreds]

What Derby and MUFC did years ago isn’t really relevant. I didn’t say it hadn’t happened before or that Neville was right (or wrong) in what he said. Neither do his actions and those of Gary Lineker have much in common.
It’s just my opinion that it’s a bit OTT to ban a pundit - and he’s more of a summariser than a ‘commentator’ anyway - because you don’t like what he said.

Hang on, lets rewind a bit shall we. It doesn't matter what I think does it?

Lets take the Ramanag household. Mr Neville has been to your house before. He then compares it to a mafia run house, and tells Mrs Ramanag to piss off and leave you. Now would you ignore that and have him back for Sunday tea. Or would you be a bit pissed off and tell him not to bother?

It's his house. He can ban who he likes, as other clubs, including yours have done in the past.

He also banned Bonnie blue, That's 2 complete cock gobblers in one week. Result

[ramAnag]

Hang on, lets rewind a bit shall we. It doesn't matter what I think does it?

Lets take the Ramanag household. Mr Neville has been to your house before. He then compares it to a mafia run house, and tells Mrs Ramanag to piss off and leave you. Now would you ignore that and have him back for Sunday tea. Or would you be a bit pissed off and tell him not to bother?

It's his house. He can ban who he likes, as other clubs, including yours have done in the past.

He also banned Bonnie blue, That's 2 complete cock gobblers in one week. Result

Apologies, the ‘you’ was meant to refer to your owner…not you personally.
Beyond that, a private house is hardly comparable to a football club is it?
Fact is that loads of clubs have to provide hospitality each week to pundits who are critical of them. I don’t know whether Neville was right or wrong in this particular criticism however he is known for being an outspoken critic of many clubs including his beloved Man. Utd. and, as far as I know, no other club has banned him and prevented him from doing his job.

[Trickytreesreds]

Apologies, the ‘you’ was meant to refer to your owner…not you personally.
Beyond that, a private house is hardly comparable to a football club is it?
Fact is that loads of clubs have to provide hospitality each week to pundits who are critical of them. I don’t know whether Neville was right or wrong in this particular criticism however he is known for being an outspoken critic of many clubs including his beloved Man. Utd. and, as far as I know, no other club has banned him and prevented him from doing his job.

Again you are dancing around it RA. It wasn't criticism. Criticising marinakis ? Fine I think we can live with that. But telling the manager to resign that very evening, was a line he stepped beyond.
Who the foook does he think he is?

Newtons 3rd law mucker

[Ramshank72]

Again you are dancing around it RA. It wasn't criticism. Criticising marinakis ? Fine I think we can live with that. But telling the manager to resign that very evening, was a line he stepped beyond.
Who the foook does he think he is?

Newtons 3rd law mucker

What did Bonnie do that upset him so much, let him go last?

[Trickytreesreds]

What did Bonnie do that upset him so much, let him go last?

What more evidence do you need. She isn't embarrassing our club.

That’s because she’s a Derby County supporter - even claiming in October that she had *** with a fan in the toilets during half time at a Championship match, after going with her dad to a September fixture.She used the trip with her father as an opportunity to produce more content too, telling the Daily Star: "I interviewed husbands outside the stadium to ask when the last time there wives had pleasured them," she said.

"And despite some of them not supporting cheating they quickly realised how lazy their wives are in the bedroom."She added: "Men love football, and I love men, so I’ll be visiting more matches in the future. Football stadiums are a perfect place for me to recruit husbands with lazy wives as it usually the only downtime they get away.

"Me pleasuring a husband at half time paid for mine and my dad's ticket, so of course he was proud."

[SithHappens]

What have Bonnie Blue and Nottingham Forest got in common?

They both blew it at the city ground.

[Trickytreesreds]

https://www.skysports.com/football/n...emain-as-owner

Of course if you believe it then you're dumber than a very dumb thing.

Which i suspect Uefa are as it makes a mockery of their rules.

oh look Sith, oh the irony

https://www.nottinghampost.com/sport/football/football-news/nottingham-forest-could-shock-europa-10232954

[SithHappens]

oh look Sith, oh the irony

https://www.nottinghampost.com/sport...uropa-10232954

I saw that and thought the same. I think in reality palace will use some loophole which enables them to play just like Forest had done. Just like all the others do.

Makes a mockery of the rules really so why bother having them in the first place if there is such an easy get out?

The easy solution would be to prevent any form of dual ownership that comes under the same governing body, either Eufa or maybe even Fifa.

Or even easier just don't have any rules, especially if they are so easy to find a loophole.

[Trickytreesreds]

I saw that and thought the same. I think in reality palace will use some loophole which enables them to play just like Forest had done. Just like all the others do.

Makes a mockery of the rules really so why bother having them in the first place if there is such an easy get out?

The easy solution would be to prevent any form of dual ownership that comes under the same governing body, either Eufa or maybe even Fifa.

Or even easier just don't have any rules, especially if they are so easy to find a loophole.

You need to talk to Man City

[Trickytreesreds]

hey Sith you'll love this one

[Trickytreesreds]

hey Sith you'll love this one

Looks like hes messed this up big time. Had plenty of time to set something up like other clubs did. But being part of Eagles group and his mates have interests in Lyon and Brondby, they could get nothing. Still every cloud and all that. NFFC and Brighton won’t complain. ��

[MadAmster]

So good you needed to post it twice?