Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The the Rangers (home)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Yeats 62 View Post
    "Everyone" ? Can you vouch for that?

    For obvious reasons you weren't sitting anywhere near me at Tannadice to hear the numerous comments on our defence.

    You get a bigger picture when sitting in the stands, not just what the camera is focusing on, on your Firestick. Watching giants get beat in the air, outpaced on the deck and not sure where they should be positioned in given situations can be pretty infuriating.

    "Lots of blocks and clearances" means lots of shots and chances on our goal. Whatever happened to our common "clean sheet"?

    And, did Dave do well? He had some good saves, I'll give you that, but whats we the punchin' thing? I thought we had "rested" that?

    Losing more than one goal in any match makes it VERY hard to win, and we seem to be doing that frequently, which should really set alarm bells ringing.

    A wee tweak required in that back line (IMO) obviously.
    Cheeky c*nt I pay for Premier Sports 🤣
    Only until I can cancel it though,robbing b*stards!

    I think you have to take into account that we are up against a team that has had millions of pounds invested in it whilst ours was assembled at a cost of diddly squat. I think we played pretty well and deserved to win, but should definitely have managed the game better at the end.

    Comment


    • #32
      The inconsistency for me is how VAR is being used. Kertzses pen against Killie taking full fortnight to seemingly find a problem.

      Seen enough of the Ferry incident and given the timing and magnitude of the incident it merited more scrutiny.

      And for me if a defender watches a ball crossing in form 30-40 yards away he has seen it his hand should not be in a position to touch it.

      To not even look at it.

      Again when considering Rangers Livi and the Scales incident the other week it is no wonder people are questioning these decisions leaning oneway.

      All of this without crowds knowing what's going on. To then get a weekly apology from Colon

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by JUSTaway View Post
        Sorry, might not fit the narrative, but soft as it is, that's a penalty 9/10 in the modern game, if the shoe was on the other foot, we'd be screaming for a pen and raging if we didn't get it. Surprised the handball didn't get looked at, but I also don't think it's a pen. We just had to keep the ball in the corner last, simple pass too, don't know if tiredness or lack of communication, but we absolutely gift then possession, and we don't do well enough winning a couple headers in our box at the end, and its naive/bad/unluck by Ferry, but he has to be aware of players around him. I thought keeper should have done better for for the first goal, punched when he could have caught, fair enough got some distance, but from the shot, good as it is, its miles out and I just think he has to do better with his dive. Got away with a calamity too early second half.

        These hard luck stories are wearing thin, we need wins, just seems to be groundhog day at moment of, competing well against the better teams but not having enough to see it through, and then playing poor most other games.
        Pretty fair and accurate post .
        Regarding penalty calls though while I agree both were correct I'm also pretty sure both would have went the other way if they were at the other end of the park .

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by TerryTheTerror View Post
          Having just seen it, I actually don't think it was a penalty. The guys arms were in a natural position so no intent can be inferred. Perhaps they are referring to mistakes being mage early season with things like this.
          I say he moved his arm towards the ball intentionally. Regardless though, why has VAR chosen not even to look at it? Someone tell me honestly that if that had been the other way around the outcome would have been the same, nah didn't think so. It's like has been pointed out, the total inconsistency and it's hard to not see it as bias. Our penalty at the weekend they spent ages trying to find some reason not to give it and yet on Wednesday VAR decided to go make themselves a cuppa so as not to have to ruin the Rangers night! It's boll*cks and we all know it!

          Comment


          • #35
            I think to drag it on a bit and make the 45 minutes longer each team should have a number of reviews they can use in each game if VAR doesn't look at an incident. Still think going for foreign officials is the way to go for a season? Why are the SFA not for this, always looking for improvements for the game but won't entertain this? What have they got to hide or could it be the Scottish officials might have to make do with Championship and below afterwards?

            Comment


            • #36
              The KMI panel have backed the sevco penalty call unanimously, like anyone thought they f*cking wouldn't? Laughable set of c*nts. I expect us to get f*cked over again today just for kicks 🫤

              Comment

              Working...
              X