Originally posted by WTF11
View Post
as a person from family steeped in Irish border history and in my husbands family case of actual forced military displacement...... possibly not wise to pontificate the modern political geo political scene with me........ particularly with my current experiences of real family life decisions into why i left the UK for France....... and subsequent global working experiences......which i do not regret.
i will say with regard to your French Vichy hook that actually, most French....... likewise de Gaulle...... would state the republic had never ceased to exist.....
in fact even the French communists came out extraordinarily strengthened from the Resistance in terms of both organisation and prestige with the liberation of France in 1944..... and entered into the government of Charles de Gaulle.......
exceptionalism is a term widely used in the area of social and political sciences......where it most often refers to a belief that a country or national culture has developed politically, economically or socially along unusual lines and needs therefore to be evaluated and interpreted within categories that are different.......
after the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union the communists began helping to form the French Resistance..... as a large number of their recruits were young immigrants with many of them workers with communist backgrounds as in my husband family case..... so his family tree is rooted with heroic exploits and casualty against the Hitler regime......
so in my base reasoning and enabled answer to your fishing french hook i will add..... that in foreign policy Gaullists are identified with both realism and French exceptionalism..... de Gaulle sought to impose French influence on the global order with Gaullists supporting decolonization which freed France from the burden of empire...... to what extent that freedom bought is again a matter of voracious debate today.
is asking that territorial governments to speak with indigenous people before implementing any programme so wrong.......
is allowing citizens to form their own country opinions over cultural and political shifts over time promoting indigenous rights and traditions wrong........ decisions of which that continues to influence ALL national identities and geopolitical dynamics today.
debate is a necessary exercise for any future engagement of active and responsible citizens in a democratic society...... debate is not truth seeking as such...... as what we find persuasive has very little to do with objective truth..... i would say.
but debate on here for me is primary about football predominantly..... whether subjective or objective as the forums future is not going to survive on other detailed topical details taking over which can make for over powering and uncomfortable reading....... leading to a loss of distinguished footballing opinions migrating elsewhere which would truly would be missed as class is permanent and form is temporary in forums as in sport.
MOT

Comment