Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

O/T:- ⚠️Impressed with the leadership [The UK Party Politics Thread]

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by i961pie View Post
    I haven't fell for anything, it is something that is obvious.
    It isn't obvious. Any polls done on here regarding voting intentions in general elections always show a right wing bias compared to the actual vote.
    Even UKIP got around 35% of the vote in one of them!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Elite_Pie View Post
      It isn't obvious. Any polls done on here regarding voting intentions in general elections always show a right wing bias compared to the actual vote.
      Even UKIP got around 35% of the vote in one of them!
      It is to me.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by i961pie View Post
        It is to me.
        Well as you must have said a hundred times, there is no objective truth and everyone just believes what confirms their biases. So that explains it.

        Comment


        • We have hit the '100,000' tests twice. On the 30th April (what a surprise!) and the following day. Since then we have missed it for 6 days on the trot. But not to worry. George Eustace (Environment Sec) said it is down to daily fluctuations and regional variations.

          Sorry Mr Eustace, very poor excuse. I was wondering what has happened to Matt Hancock but maybe he's sticking stamps on the 'tests' being posted.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by magpie_mania View Post
            We have hit the '100,000' tests twice. On the 30th April (what a surprise!) and the following day. Since then we have missed it for 6 days on the trot. But not to worry. George Eustace (Environment Sec) said it is down to daily fluctuations and regional variations.

            Sorry Mr Eustace, very poor excuse. I was wondering what has happened to Matt Hancock but maybe he's sticking stamps on the 'tests' being posted.
            Too be fair, if people don’t go and get tested then what can be done. I know I haven’t been tested as at this moment I haven’t needed a test. Has anyone else needed a test and not been able to get one due to unavailability?

            Also, if folk want to be pedantic, the Government committed to hitting 100k tests by 30th April, which they did.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Notts78 View Post
              Also, if folk want to be pedantic,
              Well, as you mentioned it, too means also or as well as. Yes I'm a dick (tell me something I don't know).

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Notts78 View Post
                Too be fair, if people don’t go and get tested then what can be done. I know I haven’t been tested as at this moment I haven’t needed a test. Has anyone else needed a test and not been able to get one due to unavailability?

                Also, if folk want to be pedantic, the Government committed to hitting 100k tests by 30th April, which they did.
                What has people not getting tested to do with daily fluctuations? Ah, I see what you are saying about 30 April - we will hit 100,000 on that day (and shove a load in the post to make sure) but then it can drop off. How are they going to get to 200,000 if people won't get tested? Or is that going to be BJ's excuse?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Notts78 View Post
                  Too be fair, if people don’t go and get tested then what can be done. I know I haven’t been tested as at this moment I haven’t needed a test. Has anyone else needed a test and not been able to get one due to unavailability?

                  Also, if folk want to be pedantic, the Government committed to hitting 100k tests by 30th April, which they did.
                  ***in ell, can you be my boss?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by i961pie View Post
                    It is to me.
                    In that case, it's yet another example of you being totally impartial in favour of the right!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Jeekay56 View Post
                      Well, as you mentioned it, too means also or as well as. Yes I'm a dick (tell me something I don't know).
                      To and too are very different. As are you

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Notts78 View Post
                        To and too are very different. As are you
                        I'm glad you learned something form this exchange, whether you are able to put it use is a different matter.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by magpie_mania View Post
                          What has people not getting tested to do with daily fluctuations? Ah, I see what you are saying about 30 April - we will hit 100,000 on that day (and shove a load in the post to make sure) but then it can drop off. How are they going to get to 200,000 if people won't get tested? Or is that going to be BJ's excuse?
                          People not being tested has everything to do with it. Surely you see that? If it’s not then who do you think is or should be tested and hasn’t been? As I said it’s not as though people are needing testing and can’t be. PPE on the other hand

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Jeekay56 View Post
                            I'm glad you learned something form this exchange, whether you are able to put it use is a different matter.
                            Hahaha touché. Which form are you referring too 🤔

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Notts78 View Post
                              Hahaha touché. Which form are you referring too 樂
                              Well played, you got me there (their). I'll have too book (buck) up my ideas.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Notts78 View Post
                                People not being tested has everything to do with it. Surely you see that? If it’s not then who do you think is or should be tested and hasn’t been? As I said it’s not as though people are needing testing and can’t be. PPE on the other hand
                                It really hasn't! I would agree with daily fluctuations if sometimes it was over 100k but sometimes under. However, two days over (and method of counting questionable) with 6 days under since (and well under) does not mathematically fit to daily fluctuations causing it.

                                If they can't get near 100k as a daily average because people aren't requesting tests, however are they going to get to BJ's 200k?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X