Tweet
Originally posted by frogmiller
View Post
-
Pearls before swine... -
-
Why does the Covid select subcommittee keep asking questions about the Whuhan lab that was looking into Corona viruse up time and time again? At least Fauci is open minded
.
Comment
-
Funny how these people regularly suffer such memory loss...Originally posted by frogmiller View PostWhy does the Covid select subcommittee keep asking questions about the Whuhan lab that was looking into Corona viruse up time and time again? At least Fauci is open minded.
https://thehill.com/homenews/4396265...-subcommittee/
“It’s been very cooperative in there. We’ve asked a lot of questions. Dr. Fauci responds in the best way he can. I will say that there may be over 100 or so far ‘I don’t recall’ or ‘I don’t remember’ answers,” Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), chair of the committee, told reporters. “That just means that maybe we have to find the people that do recall.”Comment
-
Can’t wait until Hunter Bidon laptop gets released.Comment
-
The Covid inquiry will not start hearing evidence about the development of vaccines and other drugs this summer, as originally planned.
Witness hearings will be postponed until a later date, likely to be after the next general election.
Baroness Hallett, who is chairing the inquiry, recognised the decision would be "disappointing for some".
But she said more time was needed to prepare for a separate investigation into the impact of Covid on the NHS.
"I want to ensure our hearings in 2024 are as effective as possible and I recognise the increasing pressure on organisations to respond to requests and provide information to the inquiry," she added.
"I remain committed to not allowing the inquiry hearings to run beyond my original aim of summer 2026."
The Covid-19 public inquiry has been split into a number of sections - known as modules - each covering different topics.
The first phase, which started taking evidence in June 2023, looked at planning for a pandemic. Its findings and recommendations are expected to be published this summer.
A second phase, looking at the major political decisions taken after Covid emerged, started hearings in London in October 2023, and will now travel to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to take evidence.
The module investigating vaccines and therapeutics was originally expected to start in the summer of 2024, but that has now been postponed.
Instead, public hearings will restart in September 2024 looking at the impact of the pandemic on the NHS and healthcare, as originally planned.
The investigation into vaccines was meant to look in detail at the rollout of jabs across the UK, including the setting up of the UK vaccines taskforce and the role of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation.
It will also cover concerns around vaccine safety, including any suggested link between the jabs and heart issues, and whether reforms are needed to the scheme which is meant to pay out if an individual's health is damaged after taking the jabs.
No timing has been given for the postponed hearings, with further details promised "in the next few weeks".
It is thought the decision is likely to push that part of the inquiry until after the next general election, which has to take place before 28 January 2025.
The inquiry is also still expected to question the current cabinet secretary, Simon Case, in a special hearing later this spring.
Mr Case, who has recently returned as head of the civil service after two months of sick leave, was not able to give evidence last autumn when the second phase of the inquiry looked at the political decisions made during the pandemic.
In WhatsApp exchanges with other Downing Street officials, and later read out at the inquiry, he was often critical of ministers.
In one message he accused officials, including former health secretary Matt Hancock and then-education secretary Gavin Williamson, of being "weak".
In another, he described being "at the end of my tether" over decisions being made by Boris Johnson and said the former prime minister was "unable to lead".Comment
-
The guy in the PC repair shop copied and released the contents so there are a few 'interesting' clips on the web.Originally posted by frogmiller View PostComment
-
I’ve seen that someone was flicking through a folder/book with his name on the front showing pictures of orgies, emails and documents.Originally posted by Eternal Optimist View Post
This guy, I’d not heard of him but he goes by the name of @virushunter. Actually put Epstein’s name in the credits of his book apparently.
Mhttps://x.com/warclandestine/status/1743771112054432113?s=42&t=V3MA7CRmlcvxGrPcIOixGQComment
-
Dr. Martin knows what he's talking about. He needs to be careful - he may find himself being 'Clintoned'.Originally posted by frogmiller View PostComment
-
...and that wraps up the depopulation agenda.Originally posted by frogmiller View Post
Yet another 'nut job conspiracy theory' comes true.Comment
-
Wait until the miscarriage numbers get released. It’s the saddest load of figures at first sightOriginally posted by Eternal Optimist View PostComment
-
TV presenter turned failed politician Liz Gunn talking to Australis’s lead conspiracy theorist, Maria Zeee. What could possibly go wrong?Originally posted by frogmiller View Post
It’s hard to find any serious scientific assessment of the NZ data, because no self-respecting scientist would handle stolen personal data, but Susan Oliver has made some comments:
Gunn appears at around 03:00 with a man who appears to have been chopping onions. There’s an interesting appraisal of New Zealand’s Excess deaths at 15:03 onwards (spoiler, there aren’t any).Comment
-
Originally posted by frogmiller View Post
You are getting onto dangerous ground here in two ways. Firstly, you seem to be forgetting that you are posting on a site where pregnant women or the relatives of pregnant women may well be viewing. Pregnancy is potentially stressful at the best of times. You might want to stop and think about that before making claims like yours without any evidence.
The second way in which you are moving onto dangerous ground is that your claims can be easily checked. If vaccinated men produce spike protein instead of sperm (I’ve never heard that one before!) and there is a wave of miscarriages in the vaccinated, I think we can agree that there would be evidence of a collapse of birth rates after the roll out.
There isn’t:
Comment
Comment