O/T Covid Vaccine mRNA

[crashbang]

I had it 3 months ago. Then a couple of weeks after I had the flu. The flu was worse!

But you said it messed you up , and just about every one else you knew.
Give someone power of attorney, because you have serious problems.

[frogmiller]

But you said it messed you up , and just about every one else you knew.
Give someone power of attorney, because you have serious problems.

Did I? I had to have the Covid test before I went for treatment at the hospital. My wife tested positive for Covid so I had to have the test. It was no worse than a heavy cold. I couldn’t go for the treatment because of the positive test.
When I had flu which was flu then I had another test so that I could go to the hospital and that was a positive result.

I have to have different treatments since I had my heart surgery and stroke. Coincidentally my illness started just after my second Covid jab.

[crashbang]

Did I? I had to have the Covid test before I went for treatment at the hospital. My wife tested positive for Covid so I had to have the test. It was no worse than a heavy cold. I couldn’t go for the treatment because of the positive test.
When I had flu which was flu then I had another test so that I could go to the hospital and that was a positive result.

I have to have different treatments since I had my heart surgery and stroke. Coincidentally my illness started just after my second Covid jab.

You are saying COVID has gone.
Probably the vaccine then ?

[crashbang]

Mad as a tree.

[KerrAvon]

Probably the common cold or 'flu.

The man credited with the invention of the 'Covid' test protested vociferously as his original process was distorted in order to magnify the result. As expected, the controlled media wouldn't allow you to hear a word of this as it goes against the agenda.

This resulted in the test having the ability to detect whether or not someone had had the common cold within the previous three months, so this is what they found in you/your mum.

I had wondered how long it would be before this old chestnut turned up.

MULLIS made those comments in 1997 at a time when he was sceptical about HIV being the causative agent of AIDS as opposed to it being an innocuous virus that was circulating in the human population. His comments were directed at his belief that using PCR to look for HIV would result in numerous false positives.

I don’t think anyone serious would now doubt that HIV is the causative agent of AIDS, but I dare say anyone in a mind to do so could find someone on Rumble, Telegram or Twitter who holds that view.

The PCR element of the test for covid simply amplifies the genetic material found in a sample to a level where it can be detected. The point is however is that a SARS-COV2 ‘primer’ is used in the qPCR test for covid, which means that the only thing that will be amplified is RNA from the SARS-COV2 virus. In other words, RNA from SARS-COV2 is the only thing that the test can detect.

It’s correct to say that the use of qPCR to detect SARS-COV2 RNA in a sample from a patient may indicate a recent infection as opposed to an active infection, but it’s not the only indicator that is used in diagnosis. If a patient presents with covid symptoms and qPCR finds SARS-COV2 RNA in samples taken from them, that is a powerful indicator that they have an active covid infection.

If you doubt the specificity of PCR you should contact the Criminal Case Review Commission to let them know. PCR is the standard technique used to amplify DNA traces found at crime scenes to allow them to be sequenced and compared with a suspect or the DNA database.

[KerrAvon]

Covid no longer exists?? You sure about that? What was the virus I had 3 months ago that tested positive on the covid tests? What did my mum have 6 months ago that had her testing positive and placed on covid ward of Rotherham District Gen?

I hope that your mum has made a full recovery, raging.

[Eternal Optimist]

...MULLIS....

What did you think of the video?

[KerrAvon]

What did you think of the video?

The same as the many other times that I have seen it - that it's a bit sad that a video from over a quarter of a century ago is being exploited by people who either know nothing about PCR or know but are happy to mislead the easily misled about it.

[great_fire]

Astra-Zeneca is withdrawing it's Covid vaccine.

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/astrazeneca-withdraw-covid-vaccine-worldwide-telegraph-reports-2024-05-07/

[ragingpup]

I had it 3 months ago. Then a couple of weeks after I had the flu. The flu was worse!

You had covid 3 months ago? I thought you said that it no longer exists, or didn't exist at all?

[Eternal Optimist]

The same as the many other times that I have seen it - that it's a bit sad that a video from over a quarter of a century ago is being exploited by people who either know nothing about PCR or know but are happy to mislead the easily misled about it.

Do you share his views on Fauci?

[ragingpup]

I hope that your mum has made a full recovery, raging.

Thank you Kerr. She's fully good and kicking my ass as always!

[frogmiller]

What are your views on AZ removing their vaccines from the market completely?

We are in year 4 of what would be the testing of a new vaccine under normal conditions yet these experimental vaccines were rushed through.

If these vaccines had gone through the same process and vigorous testing then they would not have gotten to market.

What if the cardiac problems are true for those who coincidentally got ill after their vaccines was directly linked to the vaccines would you say that they too should be removed from market?

At wh as t point do they stop authorising these vaccines to children who are at the least risk of being hospitalised. After all the vaccines cannot stop transmission and never have done. Are they even capable of helping anyone after the mutation of the virus they were aimed at have changed so much. Did the vaccine’s ingredients change with the mutation?

When are these questions going to be asked publicly?

[frogmiller]

Why have Moderna paid $400m to the for NIAID patent rights?

Not long after Moderna kicked off its COVID-19 vaccine launch, questions started swirling around the origins of the company's mRNA technology and the intellectual property rights to its vaccines. Now, Moderna and the U.S. government are putting one dispute to bed.

In Moderna's earnings release Thursday, the company said it recently paid the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) a $400 million "catch-up payment" under a new royalty-bearing license agreement between the parties.


The payment is part of a license agreement between Moderna and NIAID inked late last year. With the deal, Moderna is paying the U.S. government to access “certain patent rights concerning stabilizing prefusion coronavirus spike proteins,” Moderna Chief Financial Officer Jamie Mock said on a conference call Thursday.

Going forward, Moderna agreed to pay NIAID “low single-digit royalties” on COVID-19 vaccine sales, Mock added.

This agreement does not put Moderna out of the woods on the patent litigation front. Even after this deal, the vaccine maker is fighting with the U.S. National Institutes of Health over the origins of the core technology in the vaccine, The New York Times points out.

[frogmiller]

Is the pattern owned by the US government as some people would like you to believe?

It was said to be licensed as an experimental vaccine which as been pointed out can only be done by the military arm of the US government.