Quote Originally Posted by MadAmster View Post
I think we might be able to put this to bed now. To sum up...

TTR thinks those involved in the grooming/rape should be investigated and, where there's sufficient evidence, arrested, charged, brought to trial and, if found guilty, dealt with severely.

Everybody else on here agrees.

The same goes, as far as I can see, for anybody that either covered anything up, helped with a cover up or failed to report it.

The difference being that TTR and, if "social media" is anything to go by, many others, want a public inquiry into it.

Many others, myself and, I believe rA, are of the opinion that we are talking about possible criminal offences and that it should be the police who investigate, not another inquiry. If we take Rotherham, for example, it certainly shouldn't be Yorkshire police doing the investigating due to possible conflicts of interest. Another force should do the investigating.

There's no difference in the WHAT as far as I can see, it's the HOW where there are differences.

Yours etc.
(Hopefully) the voice of reason.
Perfectly put, MA.

As for being blinkered, Tricky. I prefer selective and in any further investigations I won’t be listening to someone who has built a lucrative TV career out of poverty po rn or a discredited former MP who’s own behaviour you really need to check out.