Match Thread vs. Dagenham & Redbridge 02.12.20 [NL]

[drillerpie]

Nobody was talking about Torquay as being early runaway leaders at the start of the season. If they keep up anywhere near the form they are in now they will deserve the title and we can have no complaints

I think UTM tipped Torquay to win the league.

[laddo]

We then potentially have a standout star in our midst. I hope UTM followed his prediction with a bet at the bookies?

[magpie_mania]

@Davy, yes if someone watches the game their comments have more credibility than someone who listened to someone else watching it and they in turn have more credibility than someone who didn't watch or listen and just read the scoreline after the game finished.

That's not revolutionary, that's nothing new that's just logical. Does anyone disagree other than Deluded Davy?

@Pedro that's my point in this league you can positively or negatively spin every opponent in this league. The 'No Agenda' crew can say we are bigger then them (Torquay), I've never heard of them (Wealdstone), they are out of form (Chesterfield), they used to be 2/3 divisions below us recently (Stockport) , you can do it for every side and all of the above have or will happen. People choose to ignore the league table about our opponents but never about Notts???? Funny that

It's not looking good for top spot too many poor performances to be confident but teams drop points. That's football. Nobody was talking about Torquay as being early runaway leaders at the start of the season. If they keep up anywhere near the form they are in now they will deserve the title and we can have no complaints

NCM is a spin zone hot spot a fantastic array of examples I enjoy reading them.

Regarding the first sentence, I think it needs qualifying.

The comments of people who have watched the game have more credibility if they give a fair and unbiased assessment.

[drillerpie]

We then potentially have a standout star in our midst. I hope UTM followed his prediction with a bet at the bookies?

I've no idea. He doesn't strike me as a gambling man, just someone who is very knowledgeable about football.

[laddo]

Regarding the first sentence, I think it needs qualifying.

The comments of people who have watched the game have more credibility if they give a fair and unbiased assessment.

Oh yeah you have to assume an equal amount of bias in all scenarios that's a given.

Just crazy to give such a strong definitive view and then admit you didn't see it yourself , just relied entirely on a commentary team that did.

[Davy500]

Me a pro Ardley fan ha ha ha. Good one, shut up you twonk.

Same to you, and stop talking nonsense, about how great we were, when Dag & R thought they should of won the game

[magpie_mania]

Same to you, and stop talking nonsense, about how great we were, when Dag & R thought they should of won the game

Say it as often as you want.

You sound like the outgoing US President.

Whether they thought they should have won or not, they didn't, they didn't deserve to and we played really we!l apart from scoring. If you watched the stream, you would have heard what the Dagenham commentators were saying about us.

You can have no chances in a game until the last minute. If you then miss an open goal, you say that we should have won the game.

Read the BBC report. Read the Dagenham website report - speaks of 8 of our attacks and 3 of theirs. The penalty - they said Wootton looked certain to tap the ball in but was brought down. They describe the Wootton miss near the end as a huge let off for the Daggers. They then say that at the end the Daggers continued to hold firm.

Just found stats (Dagenham first)
Possession 39%. 61%
Shots 5. 16
On target 1. 5
Corners 2. 7

[Davy500]

Say it as often as you want.

You sound like the outgoing US President.

Whether they thought they should have won or not, they didn't, they didn't deserve to and we played really we!l apart from scoring. If you watched the stream, you would have heard what the Dagenham commentators were saying about us.

You can have no chances in a game until the last minute. If you then miss an open goal, you say that we should have won the game.

Read the BBC report. Read the Dagenham website report - speaks of 8 of our attacks and 3 of theirs. The penalty - they said Wootton looked certain to tap the ball in but was brought down. They describe the Wootton miss near the end as a huge let off for the Daggers. They then say that at the end the Daggers continued to hold firm.

Just found stats (Dagenham first)
Possession 39%. 61%
Shots 5. 16
On target 1. 5
Corners 2. 7

Whether Notts should have won or not they did not, and it was a poor result against a club near the bottom

Their manager said they should of won the game, and had a good goal ruled out, as well as several missed chances , when the game was still at 0-0 later on

I do not need to watch the stream to hear what is happening and form an opinion , that is why i listen to commentary, because they are watching ,and providing live commentary. Stallard said despite us playing better in the first half, they were the better team in the second half, and although we were disappointed with only getting a point, it could have been worse , and we could of got nothing

What annoyed me ,was certain supporters mainly pro Ardley, saying how great we were, and how solid in defense we were, that simply was not true

[magpie_mania]

Whether Notts should have won or not they did not, and it was a poor result against a club near the bottom

Their manager said they should of won the game, and had a good goal ruled out, as well as several missed chances , when the game was still at 0-0 later on

I do not need to watch the stream to hear what is happening and form an opinion , that is why i listen to commentary, because they are watching ,and providing live commentary. Stallard said despite us playing better in the first half, they were the better team in the second half, and although we were disappointed with only getting a point, it could have been worse , and we could of got nothing

What annoyed me ,was certain supporters mainly pro Ardley, saying how great we were, and how solid in defense we were, that simply was not true

It simply was!

[magpie_mania]

Whether Notts should have won or not they did not, and it was a poor result against a club near the bottom

Their manager said they should of won the game, and had a good goal ruled out, as well as several missed chances , when the game was still at 0-0 later on

I do not need to watch the stream to hear what is happening and form an opinion , that is why i listen to commentary, because they are watching ,and providing live commentary. Stallard said despite us playing better in the first half, they were the better team in the second half, and although we were disappointed with only getting a point, it could have been worse , and we could of got nothing

What annoyed me ,was certain supporters mainly pro Ardley, saying how great we were, and how solid in defense we were, that simply was not true

What do you think about those stats and comments?

So Stallard said we were disappointed but it could have been worse? He's dead right. No team is not going to allow a team to have a single effort on goal.