+ Visit Aberdeen FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 9 of 69 FirstFirst ... 78910111959 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 683

Thread: New manager

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    9,571
    Quote Originally Posted by donsdaft View Post
    I took a SFA C licence coaching course in 1984.

    I never made it to Largs but I expect this rules me out regardless.
    If McInnes can get a coaching badge then so can I. Step aside Anchor Man as your turgid negative sh!tebag football is getting binned for a far more exciting brand of attacking football and a managerial attitude that will annoy the hell out of Celtic and the Govan team. If I have to sub a player because of a poor performance then I will promise to put them into the stand (of my choice) and let the fans deal with them for getting shortchanged. Stuff the new Cormack training facilities...first day of training is down on the beach. Time to harden a few of these players up.
    The only problem is I might require a decent assistant as I could well be spending a lot of time red carded and sent to sit next to Dave and his chums telling them I am sure it won’t cost the club that much money for my latest fine.
    If it helps my case I won’t look like a jakey tramp also. I will represent Aberdeen FC with swagger and fight.
    What could possibly go wrong?!

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,844
    Quote Originally Posted by Mason89 View Post
    Why not?
    He was not convicted until after he had left Aberdeen, therefore we did not sign a convicted rapist or extend his contract.
    When he was convicted, he left Portsmouth (post Aberdeen) by mutual respect.
    Had he signed for us post conviction, then you could the club to account

  3. #83
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    33,119
    Quote Originally Posted by afc1903mad View Post
    He was not convicted until after he had left Aberdeen, therefore we did not sign a convicted rapist or extend his contract.
    When he was convicted, he left Portsmouth (post Aberdeen) by mutual respect.
    Had he signed for us post conviction, then you could the club to account
    He was never convicted & has never kicked a ball for Portsmouth but don’t let that let you put you off chipping in your opinion. Always worthwhile reading them

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,844
    Quote Originally Posted by Mason89 View Post
    He was never convicted & has never kicked a ball for Portsmouth but don’t let that let you put you off chipping in your opinion. Always worthwhile reading them
    He was pursued in civil courts after he left Aberdeen and upon looking back, yes, it was Plynouth he left by mutual consent, not Portsmouth.

    My point stands though that you can't hold the club to account.

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    21,494
    He was guilty of wearing orange boots in his first game against the jutes.

    That should automatically make him guilty of everything else.

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,294
    Quote Originally Posted by donsdaft View Post
    He was guilty of wearing orange boots in his first game against the jutes.

    That should automatically make him guilty of everything else.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    33,119
    The date was set for that civil trial was already set when we signed him. So we ran a very great risk of our player being on the front of the paper, wearing our strip, losing a horrific trial & for what? It was obvious the fat w@nkers career was going downhill. It was also the reason Rangers didn’t sign him.

    All of this was pointed out at the time, so I’m perfectly comfortable blaming the club. It also shows the measure of the bell end that signed him

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,844
    Quote Originally Posted by Mason89 View Post
    The date was set for that civil trial was already set when we signed him.
    Was it?
    He signed in 2014 and the civil case was in 2017

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    33,119
    Quote Originally Posted by afc1903mad View Post
    Was it?
    He signed in 2014 and the civil case was in 2017
    That was the appeal. It was just the 4 judges that found him to be rapey fat c*nt. Del trusted his own judgment though.

    If the date wasn’t set, the civil case was definitely in the post. It’s the reason rangers didn’t sign him

  10. #90
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    12,430
    Quote Originally Posted by donsdaft View Post
    He was guilty of wearing orange boots in his first game against the jutes.

    That should automatically make him guilty of everything else.
    He was guilty of being a fat waste of space before he signed for us as well.

    Although does the orange boots thing make him guilty of that by proxy? It's all very confusing.

Page 9 of 69 FirstFirst ... 78910111959 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •