Quote Originally Posted by SwalePie View Post
OK I admit I may have missed a few posts so perhaps it has been made clear already, apologies if so, but can someone clarify for me why our owners' methods and even motives are being questioned all of a sudden after these two defeats?

The players obviously deserve criticism, perhaps even the manager despite the injuries etc. but surely not the owners and even the CEO though.

Can anyone explain properly without ranting?
Owners aren't above criticism.