Quote Originally Posted by Andy_Faber View Post
The Richard Curtice/Emily Maitless comment was an attempt to inject a bit of humour into the discussion, I'm no longer bothered if my brand of humour (which is usually well received elsewhere) passes folk on here by

I'm not attempting to defend the indefensible but I'll never tire of calling out badly thought through or innocently/deliberately misleading interpretation of open source data, or of unverified/unsubstantiated claims to support a line of argument. I'm not repeating historical or recent examples but they crop up regularly
Nothing to do with your sense of humour, Andy. I just genuinely have no idea what you’re talking about.