Quote Originally Posted by Returnofrros View Post
But but but D4L have been "greatly encouraged" by the communication.

Are you saying they are "greatly encouraged" by the poor engagement.

I'm confused, surely it can't be both.

I doubt D4L take any notice of what anyone says on here, they didn't take any notice of their membership who attended AGM.

And Linda won't even be aware this site exists.

The one or two negative opinions are because they went in a completely different direction to what they said they would.......unless I misinterpreted " holding Linda's feet to the fire "........as .........." getting bird **** AFF seats "
Think Dee4life are simply communicating the answers they got. Don't think they are greatly encouraged at all, but any residual niggles with the answers they have received are explained, they have given possible assistance, so issues remaining are still live and back in DFC's hands.


I think it is likely that "holding feet to the fire" will only become a possible strategy if the guys who actually support the club take action. I can't see Dee4life leading anything. I think their job is to bring to the attention of the DFC board issues that have been worrying fans. I hope they will keep raising issues, like the sound system for the SE, and keep raising it until it is fixed. Same goes for PATG and the problem of pigeon droppings.

It does seem that the strong and it seemed to me unanimous voices for confrontation raised at the AGM have been batted away by Nelms. Football has saved him, and will do so again imo, if we finish 10th or above this season.

I think dissenting voices emphasise the weakness of the Dee4life position.
Calls for resignations from the Dee4life board because of a failure to deliver on things like the DFC board representation seem to me to be based on an unrealistic assessment of their ability to deliver this.
If you say there are one or two negative voices why would Dee4life be concerned? Maybe I should just ignore these voices too?