
Originally Posted by
MillersTime
My point was that he was given time. The inference that we are a carousel of a club, like Watford, was harsh in that respect. Taylor wasn't because where were we heading? With what core? Short term survival is acceptable with an aging squad because it gives us the luxury of a windfall next season, failure with an aging squad leaves us with a lack of places to go. Warne didn't back himself into a corner where it felt survival or nothing. Whereas with Taylor it felt like if we went down we would be gutted throughout the spine of the side. And still would be, that's where the squad is.
Warne built a core of a squad that was either sold / moved on for progressive moves, or would then be sold / moved on for those moves. The likes of Crooks, Barlaser, Chieo etc. How we managed them can be debated, but we developed players that could / would go onto something 'better'. Who, in our current squad, is in that similar boat? Who are we developing that will undoubtedly make upwards moves? Viktor and CAM? Both brought in under you know who.
Who have we brought in since Taylor took over that looks at all likely to do that? I honestly can't think of anyone, not right now.
I'm not advocating Warne as better than Taylor, or vice versa, but the circumstances are different. The backing and the expectations as a result of the backing are different. The potential downside is bigger this time.
I'm rambling a bit but yeah.