
Originally Posted by
KerrAvon
I don't want you to be silenced, Frog. If I did, I would simply ignore you and leave this thread to the blowing tumbleweed.
I’m not trying to change your mind and am well aware that there is little prospect of doing so. Only you can do that, but you won't unless you actually start questioning the stuff that you are linking to, much of which is demonstrably drivel. I'm guessing that it was Twitter that told you that it is impossible to create a vaccine for a viral infection? Shouldn't that make you question the stuff that you are relying upon?
Part of the UK Hallett Inquiry is going to look at vaccines, but what do you think that an Inquiry into mRNA vaccines will achieve for you? For example, if it calls witnesses who claim that they cause miscarriage, how do you think they will be able to address the fact that the birthrate completely discredits such claims? Ditto claims that they cause cancer or alter DNA? Do you think it would call Right Said Fred as witnesses to hold forth upon why scientific research should not be quality controlled by peer review?
I fear that one thing that is certain is that unless you open your mind to the possibility that the Twitter algorithms are happily feeding you crap, you will be very disappointed with the results of any Inquiry and - as mentioned above - it will simply open a rich new seam of conspiracy theories.
P.s. what do you mean rushed in under USA military emergency license? It was the MHRA that granted the license in the UK, which was the first country to deploy them in a clinical setting.