Election Year or Fear!

[ramAnag]

Where do you want to start?
1. lying about not punishing pensioners? ( keep your eye on this one they aint done yet. )
2. Lying about smashing the gangs as illegal migration ( sorry I forgot, they've changed it to irregular migration ) as the boat crossings grow by the week. Lets dismantle everything that was in place, before doing anything else?
3. Division, as he picks out and targets the white population for daring to criticise the government on its policies of lack of action. Suddenly , everyone condeming mass migration and moaning about it, is far right and a racist. A tiny minority decide to riot(wrongly) so he starts to change the response rules without parliament. Folks having their doors kicked in at 5 am for posting stuff he doesn't like. Yet crime like the Romanian knifing the kid, gets very little attention. Two tier policing is very real and widespread. He sits down with the cops, so don't say he doesn't have remit on this. Folks watch the Palestinian hate marches continue and he allows it to molly coddled.
4. Rayner rips up the natives first policy on new housing. Meaning native born poor working class, really are bottom of the pile now.
Again, more anger will grow and explode.
5. Asked if his loyalties sit with the UK or DAVOS, he instantly jumped for the global gang
6. Giving away billions to other countries for their green madness, whilst confiscating prime agriculture land for solar monstrosities. ,Milliband is like a man pocessed on drugs.

In 4 weeks this lot have had the country turning on its head. Sorry, but you can't have your normal whinge of TORIES/ TORIES/ TORIES,

They are in charge and its all on them , to quote your good self.
You aint seen nowt yet. The hints are there for whats coming. From income tax to national insurance to hammering the motorist. He's sidling up to Europe in many ways, that he never explains.
The way he's going, he'll be having the place running like China soon, the way he's removing rights bit by bit. His arrogance is quite frankly repulsive

He'll be gone in less than a year, the moment his plans encroach on his left masters.

Even by your standards that is the most one eyed pile of bollux I’ve ever read on here.

‘Gone in less than a year’? Hmmm…we’ll see. Suspect that has about as much credence as all your other prophecies.

[Trickytreesreds]

Even by your standards that is the most one eyed pile of bollux I’ve ever read on here.

‘Gone in less than a year’? Hmmm…we’ll see. Suspect that has about as much credence as all your other prophecies.

which bits are wrong then?

oooooooooooooops missed one.
Pre election, we will match the Tories with a 2.5% defence budget rise. (they wanted 3%)

Now-Olivia said: "They're cutting their budget for modernising the armed forces. They're cutting their science and research budget from the armed forces.

"In a increasingly unstable global environment, that budget is pretty important - it'll be really interesting to see how senior members of the armed forces respond to this news."

Highlighting the "huge problem" this brings for Starmer, Olivia added: "Sunak said that if he was prime minister again, he would have raised defence spending to 2.5 per cent, and Keir Starmer was under huge pressure to do the same thing.

Everything we are going to do is in our manifesto, it is all costed and accounted for



Absolute lies, as politicians do, yet you refuse to acknowledge it.
THE WORST IS YET TO COME , tax tax tax

Never mind his assaults on civil liberties.

[Trickytreesreds]

Even by your standards that is the most one eyed pile of bollux I’ve ever read on here.

‘Gone in less than a year’? Hmmm…we’ll see. Suspect that has about as much credence as all your other prophecies.

Which ones?
That McGoaldrick will get a hat full in league one? Or mass immigration will cause riots and trouble across Europe?
UK will leave the EU? I think you hear and read what you want, the rest is la la laaaaaaaaaar la la not happening

[Andy_Faber]

Which ones?
That McGoaldrick will get a hat full in league one? Or mass immigration will cause riots and trouble across Europe?
UK will leave the EU? I think you hear and read what you want, the rest is la la laaaaaaaaaar la la not happening

Tricky, you aren't in danger of being banned but you are in danger of even those who give you the occasional benefit of the doubt thinking you are going through a bit of a crisis. Calm it down a bit eh? We know its tough being a Forest fan but it can't be THIS tough

[swaledale]

Even by your standards that is the most one eyed pile of bollux I’ve ever read on here.

‘Gone in less than a year’? Hmmm…we’ll see. Suspect that has about as much credence as all your other prophecies.

I think he has finally completely lost the plot, there's a lot of it about at the moment, but I guess when all ones beliefs in conspiracy theories and fake news are shown to be utter cobblers, the only thing to do is double down?

Tbh I've long since given up reading the bilge he posts, I can gather the same tripe from browsing the internet, where its clear a significant minority of deluded losers like Thicky faithfully repeat the rubbish their puppet masters spew forth. I mean its not as if a half way sentient person couldn't do a little bit of research and clearly see that most of this is utterly false.

What I find rather funny is the belief is that right wing grifters, liars who are by definition members of the "elite" they claim to be against are considerd to be the people speaking the "truth" by these poor desperate souls.

[swaledale]

A hate crime is defined as “any criminal offence which is perceived by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice based on a person’s race or perceived race; religion or perceived religion; ***ual orientation or perceived ***ual orientation; disability or perceived disability and any crime motivated by hostility or prejudice against a person who is transgender or perceived to be transgender.”


Seeing as gammon is neither about race or religion it hardly fits. Note I'm not denying its probably childish and could be insulting to certain parts of the population but then insults generally are.

On the other hand given Thickys propensity to repeatedly post utter bilge and often offensive, hateful and demonstrably false sentiments on here, IMO using the word gammon is a lesser offence.

[ramAnag]

Tricky, you aren't in danger of being banned but you are in danger of even those who give you the occasional benefit of the doubt thinking you are going through a bit of a crisis. Calm it down a bit eh?

I rest my case.

[Geoff Parkstone]

Even by your standards that is the most one eyed pile of bollux I’ve ever read on here.

‘Gone in less than a year’? Hmmm…we’ll see. Suspect that has about as much credence as all your other prophecies.

And you should recognize a one eyed pile of....😄😄

[Geoff Parkstone]

A hate crime is defined as “any criminal offence which is perceived by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice based on a person’s race or perceived race; religion or perceived religion; ***ual orientation or perceived ***ual orientation; disability or perceived disability and any crime motivated by hostility or prejudice against a person who is transgender or perceived to be transgender.”


Seeing as gammon is neither about race or religion it hardly fits. Note I'm not denying its probably childish and could be insulting to certain parts of the population but then insults generally are.

On the other hand given Thickys propensity to repeatedly post utter bilge and often offensive, hateful and demonstrably false sentiments on here, IMO using the word gammon is a lesser offence.

I'm not planning to enter the debate of what is and isn't a hate crime but just ask, for my own clarity, why gammon doesn't constitute a "hostility or prejudice based on a person’s race or perceived race" as you define it, Swale.

I've never seen the word used to describe anyone other than a white race person: the notion of a black gammon (isn't that a gambling game?) is one I've not encountered, although I have met right wing / brexiteers of all race and hue - especially South Asian - and not heard gammon used in respect of them.

Yet only white folk seem to be defined as gammon, despite the political beliefs being distributed across the racial spectrum. Maybe the ruddy complexion is not so obvious on non white faces?!

This would suggest it is a "hostility or prejudice based on a person’s race or perceived race" and therefore, by the definition you cited, a hate crime?

[MadAmster]

I'm not planning to enter the debate of what is and isn't a hate crime but just ask, for my own clarity, why gammon doesn't constitute a "hostility or prejudice based on a person’s race or perceived race" as you define it, Swale.

I've never seen the word used to describe anyone other than a white race person: the notion of a black gammon (isn't that a gambling game?) is one I've not encountered, although I have met right wing / brexiteers of all race and hue - especially South Asian - and not heard gammon used in respect of them.

Yet only white folk seem to be defined as gammon, despite the political beliefs being distributed across the racial spectrum. Maybe the ruddy complexion is not so obvious on non white faces?!

This would suggest it is a "hostility or prejudice based on a person’s race or perceived race" and therefore, by the definition you cited, a hate crime?

This whole "being offended by next to nothing" has, IMO, got completely out of hand. I do realise that some on here are pot stirring but to consider "gammon" or "gaslighter" or referring to someone as a "Karen" as being a hate crime is incredibly absurd. Whatever happened to context? Whatever happened to freedom of speech?

I fear that we are close to the point where the name calling and the complaining about being "offended" will move on from the verbal to the physical. All driven by those who would divide and conquer. Maybe it's time to stamp, metaphorically (although some might think, literally), on Tommy Ten Names and those who fund him and those who encourage him. There's more of us than them and it's time WE took control of matters before the "wrong" revolution hits the fan and the majority end up in 15 minute cities amid a great reset.

I've long thought the 5% were ensuring they remained exactly that by having politicians in their pockets and that they organised themselves into the WEF to make sure they remain in control. I am now starting to think that day is not far away when they do own everything and, as Schwab wrote, we'll have nothing and we'll be happy.

Basically, the enemy isn't those fleeing conflict and deciding to come to the UK or elsewhere in (geographically) Europe. It's not those of a different colour or of a different religion. It's the 5%. The elite. The rich. Call them what you will. They saw population in Europe falling. That would affect their trade. Growth could not be sustained. That would hit the size of the dividends. No, that can't happen. The only way to keep growth going is to increase population and population growth. Hence the great need for immigration. The richest of them fund wars that ups the number of refugees and asylum seekers. The 5% are the ONE group that benefits from mass immigration. They also control politicians and through that they control the police and armed forces.

Is the above a mere conspiracy theory I've concocted or something that has been creeping along for ages and is now close to reaching the point of no return?