[QUOTE=Robus;40550431]Not the language of children, but of leftist totalitarianism. In order to destroy real or imagined opponents, you must label them: Trotskyists, Kulaks, fascists. Then they mobilized legions of party faithful in the media, education, bureaucracy to propagate these labels throughout the culture, and to amass growing lists of enemies to apply them to. It's the decentralized, entrepreneurial nature of totalitarian repression that makes it so fearsome. Once the leaders issue the marching orders in the form of labels, the busy beavers in every locality will push the repression into the deepest corners of society. This mechanism killed 10 million people in the Soviet Union in the 1930s, many more in China under Mao. It is fully in play in Europe today.

Labels like "white supremacist," "racist" are the babbling of totalitarians. Not 30 years ago, Tony Blair vowed to "rub the noses" of the British people in diversity but pushing mass immigration on a scale that nobody wanted. He did so in order to launch a culture war, using immigration as a weapon against domestic political opponents. On every occasion, the British people voted to stop the invasion. On every occasion, they got more. The result is a growing nightmare whereby the Native English are becoming a minority in their own land, their liberties curtailed, their institutions debased, their history denigrated, their sons and daughters discriminated against for jobs and services, their children murdered or groomed, and their protests reviled as "racist" or "white supremacist."

Do you recall what Cromwell said of the Scottish Engagement at the trial of Charles I? The king had engaged Scots to cross the border and march against his English subjects. For Cromwell, this was "a more prodigious treason than any that had been perfected before; because the former quarrel was that Englishmen might rule over one another; this to vassalize us to a foreign nation."[/

Well said Robus. Part of this process is the wielding of the sword of “human rights”.

By its nature it supports the rights of minority groups over the rights of the majority, who, if they object to the blatant hypocricy of it, are given labels. They then become obvious targets.

Sadly, in my view, one of the worst targets are women, Britain is now led by a man who cannot say whether or not a woman can have a *****. Men are allowed to compete against women. You never hear of whether or not a man can have a vagina. Men and boys are to asked if they are pregnant. Women are denied the privacy of their own washrooms. The list goes on.

Again all for the benefit of a minority of people who claim their rights are being denied. Anyone who stands up for real women is pilloried - JK Rowling being an obvious candidate.

And which sect is the most mysoginistic and degrading to women? You guessed it Islam. All fits, doesn’t it.