Ok, not football at all, but it matters, eventually.

[WTF11]

FAO WTF.
An interesting film on the UKs long running Nuclear Bomb testing scandal now been acted upon as nuclear weapon test veterans seek compensation by demanding all records to be released of Government cover ups, noted.

Another example rewriting history facts via many years of alternative theories being exchanged forcing investigation regarding serious health issues with veterans which are to be aired on national BBC 2 , Wednesday 9pm & available on BBC i player too.

Just so sad that some of the contributors are speaking out for the first time at why they fight for justice still & want to be heard publicly to tell what really happened to them. 😔
https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/me...%20communities.

Also FYA too - regarding this upgrade to UK arsenal - Britain test fires new cruise missile.
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/brit...ruise-missile/
Totty xx

Www.bntva.com

[Monaco_Totty]

Not quite sure of the intent of the post? To engender an angry response from me, to get me to challenge the injustice of the way those use as test rat's during bomb tests? Clearly you'll get neither as I'm broadly sympathetic to the claims made by such veterans and disappointed that succesive government of all political stripes have failed them, repeatedly.

Some of.those affected may, as you say, be speaking out for the first time but the campaign has been "current" for decades.

If your reason for posting was to raise the subject of "theory" again, please don't bother. My opinions is that theorizing looks to future event possibilities, you disagree and suggest it can view historical fact. We're not going to agree, and of.

Jeez, some one shared the articles with me, my cousin who serves in the RAF & as you appear to have an interest in weaponry of land, sea & air i genuinely thought you may be interested in watching & reading the journal of land, sea & air latest tech development through its home page index.

Its called a mutual exchange of opinions from my point of view anyway, not fisty-cuffs.
Hey-ho, think what you wish, you usually do.

[WTF11]

Jeez, some one shared the articles with me, my cousin who serves in the RAF & as you appear to have an interest in weaponry of land, sea & air i genuinely thought you may be interested in watching & reading the journal of land, sea & air latest tech development through its home page index.

Its called a mutual exchange of opinions from my point of view anyway, not fisty-cuffs.
Hey-ho, think what you wish, you usually do.

Not usually, always.

Yes I have an interest in the armed conflict that humanity seems bent on perpetuating no matter when or where. My responses to those who question the technology available and/or used in previous conflicts is based in a very clear understanding of historical fact and a deep-seated revulsion of the modern tendency to seek to revise those facts, including assertions that the Holocaust was an invention on the part of certain allied elements.

The treatment of members of the British armed forces who witnesed nuclear bomb tests by the establishment is a matter of shame on the part of successive governments. The testing of more modern armaments is logical, hopefully more adequately governed, but hopefully never requiring of real world validation.

[Monaco_Totty]

Not usually, always.

Yes I have an interest in the armed conflict that humanity seems bent on perpetuating no matter when or where. My responses to those who question the technology available and/or used in previous conflicts is based in a very clear understanding of historical fact and a deep-seated revulsion of the modern tendency to seek to revise those facts, including assertions that the Holocaust was an invention on the part of certain allied elements.

The treatment of members of the British armed forces who witnesed nuclear bomb tests by the establishment is a matter of shame on the part of successive governments. The testing of more modern armaments is logical, hopefully more adequately governed, but hopefully never requiring of real world validation.

Ah, some common ground in there. 👍

Amidst the civil discourse between participants, gracious friendship can be forged with priceless knowledge gained & hopefully an air of compassion via self-acceptance was always instilled into me - values that you often shake your head over on here via disbelief & bemusement over most topics discussed.

I was often told that some people are concerned that efforts to regulate free expression may silence dissent by opposition. To combat such behaviour best practice was provide justification or explanation in everything that you do & say. Be open to what arises & having a deep interest in others, being an active listener by paying attention to what others are saying, asking questions & reflecting back what you heard.

Valuing and recognizing each other's perspectives can enhance communication.

Some folks do that & some obviously never do.
Which is a shame cos valuing & recognising each others perspectives can enhance communication & enrich a Forum discussion topic, imo.

Just saying, politely.

[WTF11]

Ah, some common ground in there. 👍

Amidst the civil discourse between participants, gracious friendship can be forged with priceless knowledge gained & hopefully an air of compassion via self-acceptance was always instilled into me - values that you often shake your head over on here via disbelief & bemusement over most topics discussed.

I was often told that some people are concerned that efforts to regulate free expression may silence dissent by opposition. To combat such behaviour best practice was provide justification or explanation in everything that you do & say. Be open to what arises & having a deep interest in others, being an active listener by paying attention to what others are saying, asking questions & reflecting back what you heard.

Valuing and recognizing each other's perspectives can enhance communication.

Some folks do that & some obviously never do.
Which is a shame cos valuing & recognising each others perspectives can enhance communication & enrich a Forum discussion topic, imo.

Just saying, politely.

"Compassion via self-acceptance was always instilled into me -" ......something else we share, believe it or not.

Despite others assertions I never have nor never will claim to be anything other than mortal and with all the flaws that state brings with it. I do however know wrong from right, good from bad. I know with every fibre of my being that the strong have a duty to protect the weak, that the wealthy have an equal duty to enrich the poor, and that with great power comes great responsibility. The whole thrust of my having started this thread is that the United States of America can, if led with honour, morality, courage, honesty and determination, can offer the rest of humanity an example of what we can be at our best. It can also, if those qualities are lacking, show us what we are capable of at our basest. I fear for us all, honestly and sincerely.

[WTF11]

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=wh...wiz-serp#ebo=1

[WTF11]

Nuff said

[Ozwhites]

We can only hope...🙄

[WTF11]

And now we have another Fox TV host, the woman who was instrumental in some make believe wresting extravaganza and a TV celebrity doctor as the latest nominees, none with any governmental experience, some with little or no relevant experience in the areas for which they will be responsible, in professional or public life.

Put the nominees so far into a soap opera episode and no-one would believe it. Congratulations America.

[WTF11]

Sounds like a real stand-up guy;

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world...c0361bab&ei=23

He may be anti-Islam, but I bet he'd be right behind a move to stop women driving their cars, being educated, and how much flesh they expose. Watch out ladies, he's after your rights (like a few other nominees)

And another little tidbit about this lovely man and his "fans" in the GOP;

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world...6315dbca&ei=22