o/t global warming

[Trickytreesreds]

I had hoped that sensible folk would see the "et al" in my post to which you replied and understand that I was including all such zealots and the term used was intended to avoid me having to name 473 or more names...

errrrrm no mate. Had you mixed the names up more before the et al, you'd have been correct.
But your personal stance influenced it

[MadAmster]

errrrrm no mate. Had you mixed the names up more before the et al, you'd have been correct.
But your personal stance influenced it

Good God! Now I've got a red Dog telling me what I should have written and that my "stance" influences things I post. I'll continue to type as little/much as I want thank you very much. etc and et al are perfectly good indicators of meaning and should not be demeaned.