+ Visit Leeds United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 61 of 95 FirstFirst ... 1151596061626371 ... LastLast
Results 601 to 610 of 942

Thread: Ok, not football at all, but it matters, eventually.

  1. #601
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,024
    That was post 600.

    Make it end before we get to 666

  2. #602
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    6,738
    Quote Originally Posted by Billyni View Post
    That was post 600.

    Make it end before we get to 666
    No we need it open to express our world problems save posting crap on the other threads.
    Besides if it was going to be closed they would have done it Route66

  3. #603
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    6,738

  4. #604
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,931
    Last month the likely next German chancellor Friedrich Merz surprised the countrys partners by saying it might be the moment for discussion with Paris & London on the subject of how a French or Franco-British European nuclear deterrent might operate is still far from clear.


    As President of France in the 1960s, Charles de Gaulle launched the policy of French strategic independence.
    He also said that Americans were more our friends than Russians were & that the US too also had interests & one day their interests would clash with ours.

    Of course one option might be to position French nuclear-armed planes in other countries, such as Germany or Poland. The decision to press the trigger would still rest entirely with the French President, but their presence would send a strong signal.

    Alternatively, French bombers could patrol European borders, in the same way they regularly do French borders today. Or airfields could be developed in other countries to which French bombers could quickly deploy in an emergency.

    But the credibility of US nuclear dissuasion is not what it was. That has opened the debate, and led the Germans to look more favourably on the idea of coming under a French & British umbrella now.

    Numbers are an issue. Are 300 French warheads enough against Russia's thousands? Maybe not, but in an alliance with the UK 300 become 550. Also remember that the American nuclear deterrent is still in 'theory in place' as there are currently US nuclear bombs in Germany, Italy & the Netherlands, for now.

    Today, reading that Friedrich Merz, who is expected to become Germanys next Chancellor, has announced a political deal to raise hundreds of billions of euros in extra spending on defence & infrastructure - stating
    'In view of the threats to our freedom and peace on our continent, the rule for our defence now has to be 'whatever it takes', he said.

    Just glad, I have got 3 foot stone walls & a stone floor with access to a carpeted cellar now. 👍

  5. #605
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    17,172
    Couple of points regarding the likelihood of nuclear weapons being used in the European theatre;

    First, the French nuclear weaponry is strategic, not tactical/battlefield oriented. Delivery would be by submarine, cruise missile or aircraft but yield and targets would be large and on Russian soil respectively. No French Premier would authorise such a deployment as it would guarantee annihilation.

    The UK has NO independent nuclear arsenal (strategic or otherwise), as any authority to arm Trident missiles (as opposed to merely launching them) would depend on American Presidential approval. Guess how likely that is? As long as we were able to work within NATO, with a supportive US administration, all is well. We're no longer in that happy place.

    Forget nuclear warfare in Europe and instigated by western powers of any sort, not going to happen.

    With all the European nations working in concert (bit of an ask!), without the Yanks and bearing in mind the pasting that Russian forces have suffered over the last three years, it is highly likely that Putin would consider an all out offensive aimed at a more extensive occupation of both Ukraine and the Baltic states to be too much of a risk and seeks a negotiated peace (without Trump the extortionist being involved). All depends on getting 20+ European nations (and others, perhaps the Canadians), on the same page!

  6. #606
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    17,172
    Sorry, just to be clear, Trident is also strategic, not tactical/battlefield, even if we got the go from Ronald

    And the only "western" forces with tactical nukes are the Yanks.

  7. #607
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    17,172
    And this "thing" (I can't bring myself to describe it any other way), is the other side of the same C U N T coin as its sidekick

    https://www.msn.com/en-gb/video/news...cid=hpmsn&t=44

    After the worldwide efforts following 9-11 and the deaths of service personnel from various countries whilst fighting in Afghanistan, Syria and elsewhere to insinuate that the European countries would renege on their NATO commitment is beyond the pale. The USA has a disgusting, vile, juvenile idiot as head of state, well done.

  8. #608
    Hmmmn - so the world can be a bad place - who knew.

    Not a lot we can do about it. The positive signs from all this is that EU is finally trying to agree things and speak with one voice - which is not before time.

    The more extreme things that happen the less likely Mr Farage (said like garage) is to gaining more influence.

    You should speak to more of the younger generation though as they seem to have their heads screwed on quite well.

    It?s the old timers over the age of 70 that are the problem 👀🤣

  9. #609
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,266
    Quote Originally Posted by spaldy View Post
    Who determined that the US debt clock was "full of errors"?

    The same people that grift the system?

    The US debt clock has been around for 20 years. Never been a question of it's veracity until someone decided to try to address the debt and size of government. All of a sudden it's inaccurate.

    However, you are correct. it's totally inaccurate since it does not include unfunded liabilities which some have estimated to be 2-3 times higher than the actual debt shown on the USdebtclock. States like CA, IL, NY, NJ and MA have 10's of billions in underfunded pensions as well as local municipal debt that is not included in the US national debt. The pension liability will be greater than the entire tax revenue brought in by some of these states within the next 10 years. Like social security they are technically insolvent by standard pension accounting measures but since they are government they aren't required to correct the imbalance.


    You've seen the chaos it's created to even attempt to cut the size of growth in the US government. They aren't "cutting government" they are merely shrinking the size of growth from the previous budget.

    I think it's pretty obvious that this debt will never be paid in our lifetime and likely never.
    That debtclock site you take great store in, is not an official site and states the savings it states are objective not actual

  10. #610
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    6,738
    Quote Originally Posted by Monaco_Totty View Post
    Last month the likely next German chancellor Friedrich Merz surprised the countrys partners by saying it might be the moment for discussion with Paris & London on the subject of how a French or Franco-British European nuclear deterrent might operate is still far from clear.


    As President of France in the 1960s, Charles de Gaulle launched the policy of French strategic independence.
    He also said that Americans were more our friends than Russians were & that the US too also had interests & one day their interests would clash with ours.

    Of course one option might be to position French nuclear-armed planes in other countries, such as Germany or Poland. The decision to press the trigger would still rest entirely with the French President, but their presence would send a strong signal.

    Alternatively, French bombers could patrol European borders, in the same way they regularly do French borders today. Or airfields could be developed in other countries to which French bombers could quickly deploy in an emergency.

    But the credibility of US nuclear dissuasion is not what it was. That has opened the debate, and led the Germans to look more favourably on the idea of coming under a French & British umbrella now.

    Numbers are an issue. Are 300 French warheads enough against Russia's thousands? Maybe not, but in an alliance with the UK 300 become 550. Also remember that the American nuclear deterrent is still in 'theory in place' as there are currently US nuclear bombs in Germany, Italy & the Netherlands, for now.

    Today, reading that Friedrich Merz, who is expected to become Germanys next Chancellor, has announced a political deal to raise hundreds of billions of euros in extra spending on defence & infrastructure - stating
    'In view of the threats to our freedom and peace on our continent, the rule for our defence now has to be 'whatever it takes', he said.

    Just glad, I have got 3 foot stone walls & a stone floor with access to a carpeted cellar now. ��
    What about Iran? World claims they have nuclear weapons just like the so called BS Iraq that killed thousands of people.

Page 61 of 95 FirstFirst ... 1151596061626371 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •