Quote Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds View Post
no idea why the link failed, it was there yesterday.
But yes your knowledge is flawed, after saying that the fighter pilot comment made sense, but no actual background basis to say that.
The crux of it was, that of course women can fly fighter jets, but the artificial aids supplied in overcoming g-force, let them compete.
Stick a man or woman in an old school fighter like a WW2 Spitfire and the woman will more than likely black out before a male.
It isn't anything derogatory, its genetics, of muscle mass and oxygen absorption. The same criteria apply to many sports, which gives trans men an advantage over women. Some sports like shooting make not jot of difference to *** participation. But a full-grown man, playing in women's football is a different story,
It was me that posted the assertion, not RA. You don't need a degree in human factors to know that fighter pilots deal with far more extreme forces than someone driving a rally car, unless your Vauxhall Astra is about to pull a 1000mph vertical climb of course