Election Year or Fear!

[ramAnag]

I?ll repeat what I said to rA: Mac is right, we should have better things to do than score silly irrelevant points of one another. I'll discuss any points I make with with those with open minds but I've insufficient time to argue with the blinkered

There’s a lot of it about these days. Those who think saying something often enough eventually makes it true.
It doesn’t, but if you won’t , or can’t, answer straightforward, sensible, on topic questions there’s nothing I can do other than wonder…why?

[Andy_Faber]

There’s a lot of it about these days. Those who think saying something often enough eventually makes it true.
It doesn’t, but if you won’t , or can’t, answer straightforward, sensible, on topic questions there’s nothing I can do other than wonder…why?

I refer you to post 3943.

[ramAnag]

I refer you to post 3943.

Loads, but then, as you know, I only cut it last Friday and given the current conditions, any subsequent growth has been about as scarce as your capacity for offering intelligent reasoned response to reasonable questions.

[swaledale]

Loads, but then, as you know, I only cut it last Friday and given the current conditions, any subsequent growth has been about as scarce as your capacity for offering intelligent reasoned response to reasonable questions.

Apparently we are blinkered RA! Hence his refusal to explain his position on such varied subjects as what he means by "good bullying", why he disapproves of Diversity Inclusion and Equality, why he is uncomfortable with the number of people with an ethnic background in the media, why he seems to believe totally what opinion polls say and why to express scepticism about what they actually indicate is blinkered.

Its interesting (vaguely) that whilst lambasting me for criticism and attacking him personally (guilty as charged M'Lord) it having been pointed out that you don't take that line, he has changed his tune to its because we are blinkered!

Of course it could be he has views and doesn't like them being challenged, which is odd because that's the point of a debate surely?

So unless one holds the same views as AF and largely agree with him , he doesn't engage beyond some cryptic and usually incorrect response.

[Andy_Faber]

Loads, but then, as you know, I only cut it last Friday and given the current conditions, any subsequent growth has been about as scarce as your capacity for offering intelligent reasoned response to reasonable questions.

You could always get Swale round to call it a Nazi, that should do the trick

[ramAnag]

You could always get Swale round to call it a Nazi, that should do the trick

So…you have the time to make inane and provocative asides, but not to answer sensible questions. I rest my case.

[swaledale]

So…you have the time to make inane and provocative asides, but not to answer sensible questions. I rest my case.

Indeed RA, yet he claims to want to stop petty insults and point scoring, mm.

[swaledale]

You could always get Swale round to call it a Nazi, that should do the trick

There is a subtle difference between drawing attention to how the "Good Germans" voted the Nazi's in power and weren't that bothered when they were promising, the return to the glory days of Germany persecuting minorities such as Jews, immigrants, Gypsies etc. and pointing out how there is a similarity with what's happening today and calling people Nazi's.

But I suspect such subtly is perhaps beyond your powers of deduction? As it indeed it seems to be with many other people who swallow the utter bilge pumped out by the Daily Fail, whose memorable pre- WW2 headline was "Hurrah for the Blackshirts"!