+ Visit Newcastle United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 47

Thread: Takeover back on

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    27,692
    For me, it's twist rather than stick although 'rather than' gives the wrong impression as I don't think we've got a choice.

    Under Ashley we will never progress. He's not interested in moving the club forward, he's only interested in gambling on our survival. relegated twice in 10 years and coming close on a number of other occasions and it'll catch up with us again sooner rather than later. Rafa getting a tune out of these players is a remarkable achievement-a Hughes/Pardew/Lambert/McClaren etc would have them bottom-but I think he'll be off if Ashley stays.

    If we want even a chance of progressing he has to go.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,758
    Quote Originally Posted by zippity View Post
    for me, it's twist rather than stick although 'rather than' gives the wrong impression as i don't think we've got a choice.

    Under ashley we will never progress. He's not interested in moving the club forward, he's only interested in gambling on our survival. Relegated twice in 10 years and coming close on a number of other occasions and it'll catch up with us again sooner rather than later. Rafa getting a tune out of these players is a remarkable achievement-a hughes/pardew/lambert/mcclaren etc would have them bottom-but i think he'll be off if ashley stays.

    If we want even a chance of progressing he has to go.
    your wrong about the players
    heres my reasoning be hind that
    rafa had most these players and took us down
    why because he pplayed negative defensive footy ,which when you needed points as we did we needed to be more positive .under him then we werent

    i still think that if rafa hadnt been more positive like he is now we would have gonde down

    my point being these lads played to their stregnths are a top 10-12 team at least .not fizzy as some would say

    we kept saying pardew pardewed them
    so basically we were saying they are better than he is making them

    but under rafa untill recently they were as good as when pardew managed them

    it is only the fact that rafa has eventually realsised this and played to their strengths that he is getting a tune from them .

    We have some good players and the rest are average prem players

    they arent fizzy players
    as they walked that league and have deserved the right to be called prem players

    especially by their own fans

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    5,017
    Quote Originally Posted by toptoon View Post
    It is possible that we could get a worse or the same type of owner as Ashley.
    I just hope that there has been enough publicity around our situation to warn off any such owner. This is maybe why there isn’t a queue of buyers lined up.
    If it was just a matter of running a business and making a profit then It would be easy (Ash has done that). Running a PL club to be succesful requires large investment and high risk, and the importance of Rafa being here for this to work out well cannot be underestimated.

    I wonder if Stavley is regretting not taking the plunge 6 months ago?
    What is a successful club to you?
    Or we'll put it another way. What would be successful for you if new owners come in, bearing in mind it's Newcastle United against the chosen few...or the elite?

    Just to expand on what I'm saying. How much spend and wage structure would the new owners need to up for your term of success?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    4,525
    Quote Originally Posted by pboromag View Post
    Why does anyone think a new owner will be better than ash ??

    In only maybe 2-3 cases has this been the case

    i am sure there a re a lot more clubs who have cried out for a takeover and get rid of the owner to only get someone worse

    in fact i will throw a figure of over 90% of takeovers havent produced what the fans thought

    there were a few on here not long back stating that southampton had been taken over debt cleared etc

    looks like they are going down
    crown jewels sold
    leeds
    sheffield clubs
    jack walkers club
    coventry
    villa
    cardiff
    many many manay more

    the chicken farmers
    blackpool
    black burn
    hicks a gillett liverpool
    the three russiand who took over portsmouth
    gold and sullivan
    the palace lads
    kapland and his cronies at swansea
    mashiri at everton hasnt delivered what the toffees thought they were getting
    the west brom owners have run out of money

    you could count on one hand i would think the clubs whos new owners have gone in and improved mid to long term
    I'm not sure what research brought you to 90%, but it pains me to say I agree with the sentiment - new owners don't necessarily mean change for the better.....but I'm willing to chance it in our case. We aren't going anywhere under FMA as the great man said 10 years ago. There will be no change of heart, the ship has sailed and its his loss - he could have been a legend.

    I wont believe in a takeover until I see Staveley standing at SJP with a shirt....preferably a wet one with her wearing it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    47,917
    Rafa was the manager when we went down.

    He didn't take us down.

    That was down to Schteve and Schteve alone.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,758
    Quote Originally Posted by Jammy89 View Post
    Rafa was the manager when we went down.

    He didn't take us down.

    That was down to Schteve and Schteve alone.
    nope he took us down

    he had 8 games to get us into safety
    he should have played positive footy
    but hey ho it was a great season in the fizzy
    with our prem players out performing their fizzy counter arts

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    47,917
    Quote Originally Posted by pboromag View Post
    nope he took us down

    he had 8 games to get us into safety
    he should have played positive footy
    but hey ho it was a great season in the fizzy
    with our prem players out performing their fizzy counter arts
    I agree he was the manager when we went down but he didn't take us down, the damage was long done.

    He had 8 games to save - agreed.

    He should of had 10/11 if we'd of got rid of Schteve like we all said. Then he would of saved us, our form showed that, had we played anybody but Leicester in his first game i think we'd of got something, as it was we almost did.

    It's a bit of a moot point thought really Pboro because you'll never give him in credit for anything regardless.

    So we're going to have to agree to disagree on this one.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    16,748
    Quote Originally Posted by pboromag View Post
    nope he took us down

    he had 8 games to get us into safety
    he should have played positive footy
    but hey ho it was a great season in the fizzy
    with our prem players out performing their fizzy counter arts
    When we were in the Fizzy, you constantly called our players sh*t (most notably; Shelvey). What´s made you change your mind or do you think they have developed?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    687
    You might have to find the thread where he said that

    Just to prove it....

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by AP69 View Post
    You might have to find the thread where he said that

    Just to prove it....
    That would take months trawling through the constant ****e he types

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •