General News Chat

[donsdaft]

There’s qualified people to make that call. I’m not one of them.

Are you not?

No qualifications necessary, people have been able to do this for thousands of years.

[Mason89]

Are you not?

No qualifications necessary, people have been able to do this for thousands of years.

Funny because you always sh1te it when I ask you

[Mason89]

Oh dearie me you are such a snowflake when it comes to this debating lark aren't you ? Just admitted it you and Sturgeon wokerati extraordinaire have been full rinsed on this issue. You have lost you were wrong. But its much worse than that its probably gone right over your head.. But the fact is you and your ridiculous nonsense have set back Transgender rights a decade shame on you !

That may have made sense to you but I’m scoobied. In the Isla Bryson case, my comments on it are from page 49 onward on the Sturgeonland thread. Feel free to bump anything if it helps us both to work out what point it is you’re trying to make

[donsdaft]

Funny because you always sh1te it when I ask you

Now you're talking about your weird collection of photos where blokes are dressed up as women.

But really it's easy.

Baby is born.

It's a boy or it's a girl.

Of course there's a huge industry grown up around finding out before the birth.
But I suppose you would make all that illegal, being that anyone who doesn't share your warped views is deemed a bigot.

[Mason89]

Another opportunity bottled

[donsdaft]

You know Mason, usually I end up thinking we're arguing about two completely different subjects.
Most of your posts make no sense at all.

Anyway, who do you think will win the SNP leadership.

It should be Kate but it's beginning to look like a stitch up for the weegie mad shagger.

[Mason89]

It’s just that you always talk about how simple the whole thing is, yet never so bold to actually prove it.

Whoever ends up winning the SNP leadership race, will lose it fairly quickly afterwards.

[donsdaft]

It is simple, I don't have to prove it any more than I have to prove I understand that you have to breath out as well as breath in.

That fact that you have an extensive collection of weirdos dressed up as wifies, some more successfully than others, doesn't really come into it.

Even the ones that manage to look feminine are really mannies dressed up.

[Mason89]

So it’s incredibly simple but you can’t tell the difference. Righto

[donsdaft]

Just saying the same thing over and over again doesn't make it true.

Anyway, your ridiculous case is lost, well lost at that, never to rear its ugly head again.

[Mason89]

Anyway, your ridiculous case is lost, well lost at that, never to rear its ugly head again.

You’re farting against the wind here, with this bill & science in general.

[Mason89]

Just saying the same thing over and over again doesn't make it true.

So you can tell the difference? Make your mind up eh?

[57vintage]

Whoever ends up winning the SNP leadership race, will lose it fairly quickly afterwards.

Aye, the wheesht for ‘indy’ culture, supported by The Party’s internal sub-Stalinism, is developing cracks even if The Party’s establishment is lining up behind the ‘continuity candidate’. The criticism of supposed achievements last week has/will open up the rifts, and the sectarianism will be obvious to those who haven’t previously been aware of it. Murrell’s position is precarious, and if anyone but the establishment’s candidate triumphs, he’s toast. I shall laugh, not like a drain, but like the whole of Scotland’s surface water run-off system.

Ever get the feeling you’ve been cheated?

[Mason89]

[57vintage]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]23754[/ATTACH]

That, as I understand it, is “abowt the soyze of eet” (Kevin Rowland, 2003, 2012, 2013).