Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

OT. The futures Bright, the Futures Brexit!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Andy_Faber View Post
    Changing the subject, and putting aside your glee at anything that show's the Tories in a bad light: What happens if he's right, and he's effectively been stitched up by an activist element of his staff? I'd be interested to know if you (coming from a different area of 'work' ie public sector v private sector) hadexperience of such behaviour? I saw 'it' (the inability to manage in a 'strong' manner) increasingly over my four decades in industry, yet in my last seven years working for a company from a more 'autocratic' culture I saw virtually none of it. The latter was certainly better for mental health, any given employee knew exactly where they stood, even if it wasn't especially good. Genuine question, what's your experience?
    Seen it from both sides, AF. As regards Raab...who knows. He certainly doesn’t seem to have been as guilty of overt bullying as Williamson, there again there’s that old saying...‘no smoke without fire’ and I assume the investigation was thorough and impartial.

    My own experience saw a great many dogmatic and dictatorial Heads and HoD’s in my early days of teaching in the late ‘70’s and ‘80’s. Things gradually began to improve, not least because my own generation of teachers seemed less inclined to accept such bullying.

    Having said that the two best teachers I had as a pupil and the two best I actually worked for commanded respect as a result of a combination of firmness and fairness. No one messed with them but they genuinely earned respect as opposed to fear.

    On the other side of the coin I have been involved in ‘whistleblowing’ against an established head who was acting dishonestly and inappropriately and it took a huge and unified effort to make the authorities sit up and take, very reluctant, notice. Establishments and authorities really don’t like being challenged in this way and without the unity I speak of we’d have lost.
    Equally, as a Head, I was the subject of Union investigation having disciplined a member of staff who had acted, imo, particularly stupidly and unprofessionally. Fortunately, for me, they found in my favour and I tend to believe that once things reach any sort of investigative stage then eventually the truth will out.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Andy_Faber View Post
      Forget Tricky for a minute. I'll reiterate: Statista got the data you quote from yougov. Yougov have (and admit themselves) that they have a liberal/left bias that they don't correct. I'll now add that it doesn't account for all the shift in the change in voter opinion regarding Brexit that they report. Thats being fairly even handed in commenting on both sides of the argument if there is one.
      I’d love to, in fact for a lot longer than a minute.
      I have to take your word for it. I don’t know how you know but that isn’t me saying you’re wrong.
      As I’ve said before, you mentioned a tiny adjustment by other pollsters...with differences as (possibly) significant as 55% v 32% such adjustments don’t seem terribly relevant...a point which I’m aware you’ve acknowledged.
      Now...moving on...better things to do.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by ramAnag View Post
        I’d love to, in fact for a lot longer than a minute.
        I have to take your word for it. I don’t know how you know but that isn’t me saying you’re wrong.
        As I’ve said before, you mentioned a tiny adjustment by other pollsters...with differences as (possibly) significant as 55% v 32% such adjustments don’t seem terribly relevant...a point which I’m aware you’ve acknowledged.
        Now...moving on...better things to do.
        Hurrah.

        Comment


        • Just for balance I've identified an actual Brexit benefit!!

          However, I am proud to announce that this has maybe all changed. Because I believe I have identified an Actual Brexit Benefit. And it is graced with magnificent garlands of irony.

          It comes in the form of the new Digital Nomad Visa, just recently passed into law by the Spanish government. In essence it means remote workers, who make most of their money outside Spain, can now go and live in Spain and get residency – for five years or more – and they will only pay 15 per cent tax. All they need is health insurance, an annual income of €28,000 (£24,500), and proof that they are – wait for it – non EU nationals. This scheme, like similar schemes hoving into view in Portugal, Croatia, Greece, and elsewhere – is not available to EU citizens.

          You see what I mean about irony. The first Actual Brexit Benefit, the first tangible bonus of our leaving the EU, is the ability to go and work in lovely sunny parts of the EU, and pay way less tax than any EU citizens.


          https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...0EU%20citizens.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by swaledale View Post
            Just for balance I've identified an actual Brexit benefit!!

            However, I am proud to announce that this has maybe all changed. Because I believe I have identified an Actual Brexit Benefit. And it is graced with magnificent garlands of irony.

            It comes in the form of the new Digital Nomad Visa, just recently passed into law by the Spanish government. In essence it means remote workers, who make most of their money outside Spain, can now go and live in Spain and get residency – for five years or more – and they will only pay 15 per cent tax. All they need is health insurance, an annual income of €28,000 (£24,500), and proof that they are – wait for it – non EU nationals. This scheme, like similar schemes hoving into view in Portugal, Croatia, Greece, and elsewhere – is not available to EU citizens.

            You see what I mean about irony. The first Actual Brexit Benefit, the first tangible bonus of our leaving the EU, is the ability to go and work in lovely sunny parts of the EU, and pay way less tax than any EU citizens.


            https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...0EU%20citizens.
            Can you get away without paying for a TV licence too ?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by swaledale View Post
              Just for balance I've identified an actual Brexit benefit!!

              However, I am proud to announce that this has maybe all changed. Because I believe I have identified an Actual Brexit Benefit. And it is graced with magnificent garlands of irony.

              It comes in the form of the new Digital Nomad Visa, just recently passed into law by the Spanish government. In essence it means remote workers, who make most of their money outside Spain, can now go and live in Spain and get residency – for five years or more – and they will only pay 15 per cent tax. All they need is health insurance, an annual income of €28,000 (£24,500), and proof that they are – wait for it – non EU nationals. This scheme, like similar schemes hoving into view in Portugal, Croatia, Greece, and elsewhere – is not available to EU citizens.

              You see what I mean about irony. The first Actual Brexit Benefit, the first tangible bonus of our leaving the EU, is the ability to go and work in lovely sunny parts of the EU, and pay way less tax than any EU citizens.


              https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...0EU%20citizens.
              Always knew keeping my UK Passport would have some benefits

              I only pay 20% as it is.

              Comment


              • Thinking about it though, imagine the irony of being able to move to another country to be able to earn less tax, when many of those voting leave did so to stop people coming unto the UK to earn a honest buck.

                Comment


                • You do ahve to laugh at the architects of the disaster that is Brexit! Its a complete cluster****, but according to Rees-Mogg its all down to us Remainers who out of government and out numbered by a rabid right wing press, are apparently undermining Brexit, which is why its so ****e!!

                  reminds me of work, where when a project that was never destined to succeed failed, the cheer leaders for it would blame the naysayers who pointed out at the start that it was doomed to fail!! Classic deflection of the blame to those not responsible!!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by swaledale View Post
                    You do ahve to laugh at the architects of the disaster that is Brexit! Its a complete cluster****, but according to Rees-Mogg its all down to us Remainers who out of government and out numbered by a rabid right wing press, are apparently undermining Brexit, which is why its so ****e!!

                    reminds me of work, where when a project that was never destined to succeed failed, the cheer leaders for it would blame the naysayers who pointed out at the start that it was doomed to fail!! Classic deflection of the blame to those not responsible!!
                    Well you would ‘have to laugh’ if the consequences weren’t so severe.

                    Final sentence...totally nailed it...but unfortunately approximately 50% of the ‘active electorate’ cannot accept their accountability and responsibility. We see it regularly on here, so imagine how unlikely the politicians responsible are to accept any blame.

                    Comment


                    • The UK needs a credible 3rd party who will look after ALL sections of the populace from the 1% to the poor, the fit to the infirm. A party that will champion business but not at the expense of the workers. People before profit. proper living wage. Genuine windfall tax, not one offset by tax relief. If external circumstances see a 1 off downturn in profits similar to the current excess and obscene and unearned profits then give companies a tax break. Etc... one for all and all for one, basically.

                      If that fails we could always follow the French example and revolt...

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by MadAmster View Post
                        The UK needs a credible 3rd party who will look after ALL sections of the populace from the 1% to the poor, the fit to the infirm. A party that will champion business but not at the expense of the workers. People before profit. proper living wage. Genuine windfall tax, not one offset by tax relief. If external circumstances see a 1 off downturn in profits similar to the current excess and obscene and unearned profits then give companies a tax break. Etc... one for all and all for one, basically.

                        If that fails we could always follow the French example and revolt...
                        I rather think thats what Starmer is trying to do, even if he is rather unconvincing!! Me, I'm not really bothered in catering for those ****wits that voted for Brexit!!

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by MadAmster View Post
                          The UK needs a credible 3rd party who will look after ALL sections of the populace from the 1% to the poor, the fit to the infirm. A party that will champion business but not at the expense of the workers. People before profit. proper living wage. Genuine windfall tax, not one offset by tax relief. If external circumstances see a 1 off downturn in profits similar to the current excess and obscene and unearned profits then give companies a tax break. Etc... one for all and all for one, basically.
                          You make it sound so simple...and you’d certainly have my vote.
                          Think it is what Starmer is trying to do, but the forces of greed and misplaced patriotism make it harder than it needs to be.
                          ‘People before profit’...looking after ‘ALL sections of the populace’...good grief! Just waiting for you to be denounced as an ‘idealistic snowflake’ or something similar.
                          A Green/Lab/LibDem alliance might go a long way to achieving what you seek and would actually be electable. Unfortunately (perhaps)...after recent experience, there will be much mistrust of any new Party.
                          Last edited by ramAnag; 03-05-2023, 09:00 AM.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by ramAnag View Post
                            ‘People before profit’...looking after ‘ALL sections of the populace’...good grief! Just waiting for you to be denounced as an ‘idealistic snowflake’ or something similar.
                            .
                            Snowflake no, I think we’ve moved into a post-insult era, idealistic yes, ‘people before profit’ is not realistic although there should be a balance (which is what taxes are for), I’d go for ‘all deserving sections of the populace’(ie not sporting rights dodgers for starters)

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by MadAmster View Post
                              The UK needs a credible 3rd party who will look after ALL sections of the populace from the 1% to the poor, the fit to the infirm. A party that will champion business but not at the expense of the workers. People before profit. proper living wage. Genuine windfall tax, not one offset by tax relief. If external circumstances see a 1 off downturn in profits similar to the current excess and obscene and unearned profits then give companies a tax break. Etc... one for all and all for one, basically.

                              If that fails we could always follow the French example and revolt...
                              UKIP revival?

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Ramshank72 View Post
                                UKIP revival?
                                UKIP are dead and buried, wiped out in local elections , if Farage returned to lead the Reform party, then there maybe a place for the neofascist voter, but I see Farage has admitted on TV that Brexit has been a failure.

                                Of course the claims are that it wasn't implemented properly, though goodness knows what that would ahve looked like! I mean we chose a hard Brexit, ignored the reality of matters like Northern Ireland etc. and have ended up in the mess we are in. I note that immigration is forecast to be higher than pre Brexit this year, just not from EU countries, that will please the Brexiteers.

                                Then one gets loons like Widdecombe and Braverman claiming that UK workers could train to be fruit pickers, butchers etc. Mm one problem there aren't enough of them and even if there were, they don't live where the jobs are and we all know the average Brit hates living anywhere other than the place they were brought up in!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X