Originally posted by jackal2
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
O/T:- ⚠️Impressed with the leadership [The UK Party Politics Thread]
Collapse
X
-
I actually don't. Last week I found myself agreeing more with Jeremy Corbyn and Diane Abbott than I did with the Conservative PM, which is a bit disconcerting, but it is what it is. If you're looking for posters with a far more myopic or rigid view of life than mine, you won't have to look any further than this thread.Originally posted by Maggie's Farm View Postif you see everything in life through a UK party political lens, perhaps it is odd.
I agree, not just with regard to the Covid response but in other areas of life too.Originally posted by Maggie's Farm View PostI find it quite heartening how many people are making personal sacrifices to benefit the whole.
Comment
-
By the same token how many people have been listed as dying of covid rather than dying with covid?Originally posted by PedroTheFisherman66 View PostI think they have male chickened up the figures.They have found people going in for other reasons ,say a broken ankle and when tested have Covid are then included in the Covid figures admitted to Hospital ! Stupid really surely those being treated for Covid should have a figure all of its very own.
Comment
-
Here are the definitions used for civic hospitalisation data collection:Originally posted by PedroTheFisherman66 View PostI think they have male chickened up the figures.They have found people going in for other reasons ,say a broken ankle and when tested have Covid are then included in the Covid figures admitted to Hospital ! Stupid really surely those being treated for Covid should have a figure all of its very own.
For all relevant data items: a confirmed COVID-19 patient is any patient admitted to the
trust who has recently (ie in the last 14 days) tested positive for COVID-19 following a
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test.
Patients who have been diagnosed via X-ray and assessment rather than a positive test
should be counted as suspected (and not confirmed) COVID-19 patients.
Report a patient as a confirmed COVID-19 patient in the sitrep for as long as they are being
treated as a COVID-19 patient – so either they are being treated for COVID-19 caused
symptoms or the trust is still taking the precautions they would take with a COVID-19
positive patient.
A patient who has previously but not recently – (ie not in the last 14 days) had a positive
COVID-19 test and is admitted for non-COVID-19 related treatment should not be counted
as a confirmed COVID-19 patient.
Comment
-
[proceeds to see everything through UK political lens!]Originally posted by jackal2 View PostI actually don't.
commieOriginally posted by jackal2 View PostI agree, not just with regard to the Covid response but in other areas of life too.
happy new year to all! thanks for the debates and COY[***y]P!
Comment
-
I think they should report figures of those who have gone to hospital because of Covid, not with Covid.Originally posted by cher1 View PostHere are the definitions used for civic hospitalisation data collection:
For all relevant data items: a confirmed COVID-19 patient is any patient admitted to the
trust who has recently (ie in the last 14 days) tested positive for COVID-19 following a
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test.
Patients who have been diagnosed via X-ray and assessment rather than a positive test
should be counted as suspected (and not confirmed) COVID-19 patients.
Report a patient as a confirmed COVID-19 patient in the sitrep for as long as they are being
treated as a COVID-19 patient – so either they are being treated for COVID-19 caused
symptoms or the trust is still taking the precautions they would take with a COVID-19
positive patient.
A patient who has previously but not recently – (ie not in the last 14 days) had a positive
COVID-19 test and is admitted for non-COVID-19 related treatment should not be counted
as a confirmed COVID-19 patient.
I realise that Covid deny-ers will use their calculations to argue against the figures, but do people really think they are putting up extra provision across the country - Nightingale hubs - without genuine belief that they may be needed?
Comment
-
Damn! My cover is blown!Originally posted by Maggie's Farm View Postcommie

Yes, Happy New Year to all. Irrespective of politics, we all have a common interest in the success of the Mighty 'Pies, and that's what NCM is about at the end of the day!Originally posted by Maggie's Farm View Posthappy new year to all! thanks for the debates and COY[***y]P!
Last edited by jackal2; 30-12-2021, 11:03 PM.
Comment
-
i think this section would lead to misinformation regards people not actually being treated for Covid , but having Covid
" Report a patient as a confirmed COVID-19 patient in the sitrep for as long as they are being
treated as a COVID-19 patient – so either they are being treated for COVID-19 caused
symptoms or the trust is still taking the precautions they would take with a COVID-19
positive patient "
Comment
-
I tend to agree, although the number in hospital with Covid is important as it shows the effect on the NHS.Originally posted by PedroTheFisherman66 View Posti think this section would lead to misinformation regards people not actually being treated for Covid , but having Covid
" Report a patient as a confirmed COVID-19 patient in the sitrep for as long as they are being
treated as a COVID-19 patient – so either they are being treated for COVID-19 caused
symptoms or the trust is still taking the precautions they would take with a COVID-19
positive patient "
Would be best to report:
Number having to go in hospital because of Covid
Number in hospital for other reasons who have Covid
I hear people say that numbers are highly inflated but I read that it's 17% who have Covid but that isn't the primary reason they are in hospital.
Comment
-
It’s also probably the case that NHS Trusts record figures that they themselves need to know in order to manage their resources as efficiently as they can. Those figures are then quoted for other purposes. And if anyone tries to change the categories that are recorded, they get it in the neck from everyone who has an axe to grind.Originally posted by magpie_mania View PostI tend to agree, although the number in hospital with Covid is important as it shows the effect on the NHS.
Would be best to report:
Number having to go in hospital because of Covid
Number in hospital for other reasons who have Covid
I hear people say that numbers are highly inflated but I read that it's 17% who have Covid but that isn't the primary reason they are in hospital.
Comment
-
61% of hospitalised covid patients unvaccinated - see the facts!
Comment
-
Why on earth do people think the figures are inflated?Originally posted by magpie_mania View PostI tend to agree, although the number in hospital with Covid is important as it shows the effect on the NHS.
Would be best to report:
Number having to go in hospital because of Covid
Number in hospital for other reasons who have Covid
I hear people say that numbers are highly inflated but I read that it's 17% who have Covid but that isn't the primary reason they are in hospital.
The NHS track their patients who are in for other reasons but have Covid, and for those in because of Covid. If you watched the Covid update last night Sir Chris Whitty showed the graph.
There are stacks of statistics available from the ONS and Health websites - far too many to throw them all around. Nothing is hidden.
I don't know how it benefits the public in general to know which category a patient is in hospital for, and if someone is in hospital for some other reason, but has Covid, then they are going to need extra resources anyway, isolation, extra treatment and extra caution from the medical staff.
Edit: see https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...tal-admissions
Comment
-
Just read this on a report as to whether Novak Djokovic should be allowed to play in the Australian Open:
Many Australians had previously accused the government of allowing the rich and famous to do as they please while ordinary people remained separated from sick and dying loved ones.
ps to QP and FL - substitute "rich and famous" for "the government" over here.
Comment
-
They’ve had a change of heart, thank goodness.Originally posted by Elite_Pie View PostJust read this on a report as to whether Novak Djokovic should be allowed to play in the Australian Open:
Many Australians had previously accused the government of allowing the rich and famous to do as they please while ordinary people remained separated from sick and dying loved ones.
ps to QP and FL - substitute "rich and famous" for "the government" over here.
Comment

Comment