Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anyone going to the march on Saturday

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by frogmiller View Post
    You are so gullible for a lawyer/scientist 😂😂😂

    I don?t mind being wrong but you just use official information to be right in every argument.

    You claimed 40,000 patriots and 250,000 Stand Up For Rapists attended today @MyArrse. Heres the Patriot march. This was the patriot crowd. Dont you look ridiculous now? https://t.co/k3FXxiHzV6


    150,00 people in this video? You are a crooked man!
    don?t forget he?s been a bit of a gentleman farmer , surgeon and legal eagle and also abit of a Danny Kay ,Walter Mitty .

    Comment


    • #32
      More than John Merrick !!!🥱

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by frogmiller View Post
        You are so gullible for a lawyer/scientist ������

        I don?t mind being wrong but you just use official information to be right in every argument.

        You claimed 40,000 patriots and 250,000 Stand Up For Rapists attended today @MyArrse. Heres the Patriot march. This was the patriot crowd. Dont you look ridiculous now? https://t.co/k3FXxiHzV6


        150,00 people in this video? You are a crooked man!

        Nah. He simply pushes the (transparent) Deep State agenda.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Stovicmiller View Post
          don?t forget he?s been a bit of a gentleman farmer , surgeon and legal eagle and also abit of a Danny Kay ,Walter Mitty .
          But not a dickhead

          Comment


          • #35
            Shouting Charlie?s in a box. Very classy.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by mygiddypant View Post
              But not a dickhead
              wasn’t going to reply but thought that it would be rude if I didn’t . I did ask you the same question that I asked roly , I’ve called him that for the sensitive souls on here, have you decided who the racists are on this site, you’ve thrown that word bout without naming names, I can only assume you suffer from the same affliction as roly no *******s. I don’t expect an answer because you didn’t answer the question before.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by frogmiller View Post
                Are you saying that they are not patriots?
                Frog,Robinson and crew are obviously what you think being a patriot is,I find that very sad,and a bit worrying.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Stovicmiller View Post
                  wasn’t going to reply but thought that it would be rude if I didn’t . I did ask you the same question that I asked roly , I’ve called him that for the sensitive souls on here, have you decided who the racists are on this site, you’ve thrown that word bout without naming names, I can only assume you suffer from the same affliction as roly no *******s. I don’t expect an answer because you didn’t answer the question before.
                  They won?t answer. Why because it?s an easy slur to band about just like far right.
                  They have zero evidence but it?s aimed to shut down the discussion and makes them feel superior.
                  The tolerant left.
                  As said above singing Charlie?s in a box. Such compassionate people.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by frogmiller View Post
                    You are so gullible for a lawyer/scientist 😂😂😂

                    I don?t mind being wrong but you just use official information to be right in every argument.

                    You claimed 40,000 patriots and 250,000 Stand Up For Rapists attended today @MyArrse. Heres the Patriot march. This was the patriot crowd. Dont you look ridiculous now? https://t.co/k3FXxiHzV6


                    150,00 people in this video? You are a crooked man!
                    So let me just check the position:

                    1. When Twitter was alive with the news that the Met had estimated the crowd at 3 million, you liked that and trusted the boys in blue to the point where you posted it on here.

                    2. When I pointed out that the Met had actually given an estimate of 110 to 150k, you decided that the boys in blue weren't to be trusted after all.

                    3. You are now relying upon a whole new body of self-appointed image analysts on Twitter who can look at aerial footage and say that the Met figures are wrong.

                    And I'm the gullible one....

                    Ok

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by mygiddypant View Post
                      But not a dickhead
                      In fairness, my partner might disagree with that.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Back of the net View Post
                        They won?t answer. Why because it?s an easy slur to band about just like far right.
                        They have zero evidence but it?s aimed to shut down the discussion and makes them feel superior.
                        The tolerant left.
                        As said above singing Charlie?s in a box. Such compassionate people.
                        Where's the compassion in chucking flares and bottles at police officers- the behaviour that you were trying to deflect from earlier?

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by KerrAvon View Post
                          Where's the compassion in chucking flares and bottles at police officers- the behaviour that you were trying to deflect from earlier?
                          Oh yes the look what someone else did tactic. The lefts MO celebrating someone getting shot is sick. But only if you have a moral compass.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Good news for people concerned with rising immigration levels. Data from the Migration Observatory show that net immigration dropped by over 50% in year ending 2024 from the previous year.

                            Interesting discussion of the strange world of immigration reporting:

                            An overview of net migration in the UK – defined as the difference between immigration and emigration of people moving for at least a year.


                            Most notable is the large numbers of international students making up substantially the biggest group of immigrants as HE maximises its numbers to offset the reductions in government funding as well as large numbers of health and social care visas granted to fill those essential service roles, but now diminishing due to previous government's decision to deny their spouse entry. Fair enough but who's going to wipe our bottoms in the coming years? Not too worry don't want to dampen this good news.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by KerrAvon View Post
                              So let me just check the position:

                              1. When Twitter was alive with the news that the Met had estimated the crowd at 3 million, you liked that and trusted the boys in blue to the point where you posted it on here.

                              2. When I pointed out that the Met had actually given an estimate of 110 to 150k, you decided that the boys in blue weren't to be trusted after all.

                              3. You are now relying upon a whole new body of self-appointed image analysts on Twitter who can look at aerial footage and say that the Met figures are wrong.

                              And I'm the gullible one....

                              Ok
                              Denounce and deflect!

                              Who else apart from X is showing these I
                              Ages.
                              Thé Gardian did yesterday but took them down.

                              I know several police offices and they tell a different story than the BBC tell.

                              You talk bull! You are a career lier as is anyone in your profession otherwise you wouldn’t need appeals court.

                              You hide behind a judge to determine whether it is the defence or the prosecution of the twisted truths and exaggerations.

                              We ste entering a world where no one trusts the likes of you, doctor or bank managers! You have been outed by social media.

                              Keep believing what you are told on main stream media because it counts for nothing now!

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by ragingpup View Post
                                Good news for people concerned with rising immigration levels. Data from the Migration Observatory show that net immigration dropped by over 50% in year ending 2024 from the previous year.

                                Interesting discussion of the strange world of immigration reporting:

                                An overview of net migration in the UK – defined as the difference between immigration and emigration of people moving for at least a year.


                                Most notable is the large numbers of international students making up substantially the biggest group of immigrants as HE maximises its numbers to offset the reductions in government funding as well as large numbers of health and social care visas granted to fill those essential service roles, but now diminishing due to previous government's decision to deny their spouse entry. Fair enough but who's going to wipe our bottoms in the coming years? Not too worry don't want to dampen this good news.
                                The students being in the overall figure has always been mystifying. Only because it is usually the same coming in as what go out.
                                Why they put them in the figure has always caused problems for successive governments when trying to reduce the number of immigrants to under 100k

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X