Quote Originally Posted by GB72 View Post
It?s a bit like the boys who never go to dens, don?t put a penny into the club, but they have got as much right to criticise as much as a season ticket holder?..you don?t

Until you get off your fat arse, and unplug your firestick and then contribute to the club then you can have a say.

So many ?fans? who never ever go, then criticise the players the club is signing?.
Correct, buy a ticket to be invested.

If you're invested in something you have the right to comment, if not then butt out and keep your views to yourself.

But that's nothing like refusing to contribute to a 'foundation' which is essentially a money grab with no specified target for the funds that are being contributed. It's very easy therefore to say that a percentages of the money donated will go to player funding, ground maintenance, player recruitment, youth academy, other good stuff and staff wages / expenses. Its the staff wages / expenses that's the bone of contention with me as that will include a proportion going to John Nelms' salary which is, in my opinion at least, completely unacceptable.

For a foundation to be successful and effective (my opinion mind) all funds raised via it need to be ring fenced for a specific purpose in the same way the Dee Lottery income is ring fenced for the youth squads. Otherwise it's a charge rather than a foundation.