
Originally Posted by
KerrAvon
He didn't mention the ?fact? that she gave her speech in Urdu. He copied and pasted an article from an unidentified source that said that she was born in Pakistan (she wasn't) and that Rotherham is a city (it isn't). The article also implied that there was something irregular in her having been appointed to her (purely honorary) position by councillors (just like every other mayor that Rotherham has had). With those obvious inaccuracies on display, I would question whether anyone could be satisfied that the reference to her giving her speech in Urdu is true. I would also question where howdy came by that information.
I stand to be corrected (as always) but it may be that she gave part of her speech in Urdu to reflect her heritage and the makeup of the Rotherham population but I?m not convinced that?s a hanging offence or even an issue.
You say that one of her chosen charities seems to dismiss the massive issue in the town. How does that work? There are a host of charities that touch upon issues within the town. Does favouring one that she might have an insight into mean that she is dismissing every other cause? Clearly not.
I thought it was supposed to be the liberal left who search for things to be offended by?