Originally Posted by
ragingpup
This is a point I made about articles I posted from skyhawkbox and the canary to Kerr but I don't recall you or anyone supporting my argument then!
Of course they may post some truths on their sites and all reports shouldn't be dismissed just because of who published it (although Kerr, whom you look up to will disagree with both of us there). The report fire linked to may or may not be true, I haven't read it. I just responded to his source which has a poor record for checking sources and deliberately misleading readers with unreliable data. The canary is left wing biased (though not extreme like Guido) but has a high standard in presenting correct factual information to back up its left wing. I think this is important. I personally would not take in regular readership of media like this is, along with some factually correct articles is a proven record of deliberately misleading ones, designed to mislead their readers, arm them with incorrect facts. The same goes for left wing media like the Mirror and Russia today (which Kerr correctly scorned me for linking to a while ago!).
But yes I agree we shouldn't dismiss an article just because of who published it and I haven't.
Hall Of Fame
