Seems to be a bit of revisionism about how good we were under LW. I thought I was maybe misremembering so I checked a random game from Sept 2023. It was Forest Green. We won 4-3 against a team that eventually went down.
We managed - according to the stats - a total of 11 shots. Fortunately 4 went in. But we were hardly creating chances at will.
Week after we scored 4 again from 21 shots. Still less than yesterday. Unfortunately we managed to concede 5.
Week after at Barrow we managed 5 shots. That is not a typo.
Then it was Mansfield....
At Harrogate we broke the world record for the most passes back to the goalkeeper since it was made illegal to pick it up. The home fans cheered every one.
So I fail to see how the football now is so much worse. In fact I see enough evidence that we're prepared to vary it a bit which we certainly weren't under LW.
I was at the Harrogate away game last season, and it was so bad. There was a growing sense among the fans around that time that we'd be found out and had run out of ideas. I loved LW and would welcome him back, but there were signs towards the end of his reign that something wasn't right. His style of football was often exciting, but it could be frustrating too, and sometimes even embarrassing.
That is just denying that when the 2nd half curtain goes up NCFC are a different side than when the 1st half curtain closed, we ARE a different side 2nd half, that has been displayed time and time again, we drop points/lose games because something happens, if we still had the tea lady we could blame her but we don't, as i said it is an enigma.
The point I'm labouring to make is that my gut feel is the football is not substantially different from what it was under LW. The stats say we actually had less attempts at goal, but we converted more often when we did.
So we were, arguably, creating fewer but better chances. Bar for a couple of exceptional games, we weren't cutting teams open at will.
It also feels to me like our average possession is lower this season, because we're a bit more likely to try something. Only a bit, but it feels different to the super-cautious don't-do-it-unless-its-definitely-on approach.