Election Year or Fear!

[Trickytreesreds]

Anyway, Starmer appears to have managed to negotiate some sort of accommodation with the orange man child and a trade deal with India, which the Tories were for whatever reason unable to complete whilst they were in office. I'm by no means not in accord with everything this government has done, but at least with regard to Trump so far Starmer seems to have played it right.

wahahahahaha , Badenoch dumped the India deal, as it had strings attached including more visa's and juicy gimmes. So what does does S
tarmer do? , he pushes through that very thing and gives them tax breaks , so they can undercut the British work force more. all for a 4 billion trade deal?
Meanwhile, its announced asylum accomadation will rise to 15 billion a year, lol
But you being the globalist you are, supports that, as it doesn't hurt you. You really are wasted not being a current MP.

So much for mr finance and his backing the country.

Been a good week? Its deluded ones like you that seem to view the world with your head looking at your insides.
They've just had a local election mauling and continue to drop like a house brick in the pols.
Starmers popularity is now on par with Meghan Markel, lol (thats official)
But you call it a good week? Comedy gold


I still keep laughing my tits off at this. Is their anyone in this government that doesn't lie, as too their experience and qualifications?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b2714349.html

[Trickytreesreds]

So, if this kicks off, what will the reaction be here?

https://news.sky.com/story/india-wil...-news-13364148

They rioted and beat the crap out each other over a cricket match last time.
The image of a lovely multi cultural utopia is about to be severely tested.

[Trickytreesreds]

BTW Swale, you missed another embarrassing one out your praise as well.

‘The industrial-scale rape of white working-class girls is not a ‘dog whistle’. It’s a stain on our nation!’
If Keir Starmer had a backbone and a moral compass he would sack Lucy Powell for her abhorrent remarks about Pakistani rape gangs.
But he won't. Why?
Because he agrees with her, just like the rest of this utterly shameful Labour Party.


Shameless

[Trickytreesreds]

Anyway, at least the world has a pope now who will get things sorted

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...d=BingNewsSerp

[Trickytreesreds]

Never mind RA, your far right everywhere theories die again. Just local people fed up with being lied to and abused by the government.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...d=BingNewsVerp

[SithHappens]

[Andy_Faber]

You might have seen The Daily Mash which has headlines like that all the time - proof (in my case anyway) that humour triumphs over political conviction, I've nearly spat my coffee out many times lolling at their witty calling out of all and sundry, whatever the colour of their rosettes

[SithHappens]

You might have seen The Daily Mash which has headlines like that all the time - proof (in my case anyway) that humour triumphs over political conviction, I've nearly spat my coffee out many times lolling at their witty calling out of all and sundry, whatever the colour of their rosettes

We all definitely need to take a stop back sometimes yeah and just have a laugh.

[swaledale]

You slipped again, twice in one post this time

No slippage at all. I tell it like it is, anybody who repeats parrot fashion falsehoods, exaggerations put out by dodgy commentators or media with very little factual basis is by definition dim.

Still avoiding answering for your debateable posts I see, good to see you staying true to form.

[MadAmster]

ChatGPT says that the UK population in 2024 was 68.18M

ChatGPT says that the number of GPs in 2024 was 48,948 full-time equivalent (FTE)

68000000 / 49000 = 1387.75 patients per GP. 110 more per GP than I'd worked out from my previous searches. Due to this number being FTE?

In post #3262 (?) you quoted 2300 patients per GP in 2024. Over 900 difference with what I've just found using ChatGPT, something you used to look at figures. How on earth can the same programme come up with such huge differences?

It may be my wording but I'm not having a go, and haven't been. I like things to be correct. I have found stuff. This 2nd run at getting info isn't far removed from my first run at it. Major difference is that the GP number is less because it's now FTE rather than total numbers. Hasn't made much of a difference to my population:GP ratios. What I'm trying to get at is what is the ratio? 1200 to 1300 as I've come up with using 2 different methods or the 2300 NHS etc are saying. Without the definitive answer to that conundrum, any discussion on numbers is irrelevant, IMO. I'm not arsed if I'm the one coming to the wrong conclusion, I just want a conclusion reached that is based on correct data. If I'm "right" great, if I'm "wrong" I'll happily say so.