Quote Originally Posted by tommopie8 View Post
The announcement is obviously bigger than just a head coach, with the wording of the statement I'd say it's something that flies in the face of the traditional which is why they've lubed us up with the paragraph regarding the restructure.

Typically this would be moving away from the all encompassing 'Manager' role aka your Ferguson who controls everything to a Head Coach and DoF model. We already have that and they obviously aren't reverting to the traditional manager model.

What this entails is anyone's guess. We don't have enough players to warrant a B team which leaves me leaning towards there either being no recognised head coach or multiple.

I'd rather fail trying to be innovative than fail on the merry-go-round of players on the way down with the same old names circulating whenever a manager role becomes available so I'm cautiously excited.

Lovely bloke or not it can't be anymore underwhelming than appointing the Wealdstone head coach after our most exciting one in years gets poached by a Championship club.

It's like waiting to open a present on Christmas but not knowing when Christmas is.
There is nothing wrong with being innovative but things like ?multiple? head coaches or coaches is a recipe for failure.

You can only ever have one boss imo as if we have a group of 3 who gets the final call and then who is responsible for poor results ?

Football is a simple sport really so keep it simple 11 players on the pitch and one head coach/manager is the starting point.