Quote Originally Posted by Old_time_miller View Post
Another sarky member. Arguing for the sake of it. Let me put you straight.

1. He is saying they can’t do it, not that there is anything wrong with doing it nor would any of us disagree. He is stating why they can’t
I know what he said, I've played it 3 times. Have you forgotten your original point?

You just called LC out for asking the players to do something that they can't do. I assume you mean simple things like run hard and play with a degree of intensity. That's the minimum expectation any manager would have. If he's asked them to do it and they can't, that's not on the new manager, that's on the players and the previous manager.

Quote Originally Posted by Old_time_miller View Post
2. Never supported hamshaw playing 3 at the back. My view was, inc WB, we don’t have the players for it….example, jules! energetic defender, not really.

However, the great games and performances we had, albeit isolated with 3 at the back, even recently, plymouth, away at exeter means 3 at the back isn’t a given naughty.
Well that's wrong for a start.

We played with a back 4 against Plymouth for 85 minutes and then your pal MH inexplicably changed shape when he swapped Martha for Agbaire. Against Exeter, we started with a back 4. We switched to a 5 because Gore injured his shoulder on 40 minutes and was replaced by Adegboyega

Remember now?