+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 93

Thread: Southgate

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    9,136
    I'd Seen that Sarina Wiegman's name was up for consideration. I would not classify her as a token choice just to make the FA look good. She does know what she's doing clearly. Thoughts? I don't really know what to think! One thing to consider is that having a female in charge might stop a lot of the ridiculous ill considered media and fan vitriol ( for a while). Of course in the long term it could make it worse as well.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    634
    Quote Originally Posted by queenslandpie View Post
    I'd Seen that Sarina Wiegman's name was up for consideration. I would not classify her as a token choice just to make the FA look good. She does know what she's doing clearly. Thoughts? I don't really know what to think! One thing to consider is that having a female in charge might stop a lot of the ridiculous ill considered media and fan vitriol ( for a while). Of course in the long term it could make it worse as well.
    Unfortunately I think she would be treated like other women. Maybe not initially by the media, but by a lot of people on social media. I think the media would follow, unless she was doing a fantastic job. At the first poor performance, some of the pundits would turn on her - “she doesn’t know anything about the men’s game, she’s out of her depth etc.”. All the misogyny and lack of respect for women would surface.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    1,606
    Quote Originally Posted by applepie2 View Post
    Unfortunately I think she would be treated like other women. Maybe not initially by the media, but by a lot of people on social media. I think the media would follow, unless she was doing a fantastic job. At the first poor performance, some of the pundits would turn on her - “she doesn’t know anything about the men’s game, she’s out of her depth etc.”. All the misogyny and lack of respect for women would surface.
    Sorry to be pedantic, but is it always misogyny when someone says that due to someone's $ex, they are not in a position to do the best job? In an ideal world, of course that wouldn't be a contributing factor, but unfortunately, we are all human beings (well most of us) and we all have a living brain (well most of us) and we can interpret why someone might not be good at a job. It's a big call to appoint someone to a role purely on their $ex. It happens a lot in business nowadays and the employees end up suffering because of it.

    If the FA genuinely believe she is the best person in the world for the job - then go for it. However, if they are bandying her name around to tick boxes, then that is cruel to her and to England football fans.

    As an aside, I played under a female football manager at Linby Athletic in the 90s for a short time. She had articles in many magazines written about her and I think she was even on TV comparing her to Cherie Lunghi's character, the Manageress. To be honest she was crap and although her husband played for the team and we all knew her well before she took over, it never worked out. There was that 'je ne sais quoi' about the whole situation. Don't get me wrong, I've played under some bad male managers, but don't call me a misandrist for saying it.

    The women's game is nowhere near the level of the man's game - it may be one day, but certainly not in my lifetime and without the legalisation of performance enhancing drugs, I think it would be difficult to get it there.

    It's funny, over here they are really pushing Male Netball. The national team is probably on a par with the women's team, but hardly anyone watches them. Netball is massive in New Zealand (like rugby - don't talk to me about minority sports), but very few self-respecting Kiwi males would pay to watch men play Netball - although they will pay to watch Men play Basketball. It's a funny old world.
    Last edited by Lullapie; 18-07-2024 at 12:18 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    9,136
    Quote Originally Posted by Lullapie View Post
    Sorry to be pedantic, but is it always misogyny when someone says that due to someone's $ex, they are not in a position to do the best job? In an ideal world, of course that wouldn't be a contributing factor, but unfortunately, we are all human beings (well most of us) and we all have a living brain (well most of us) and we can interpret why someone might not be good at a job. It's a big call to appoint someone to a role purely on their $ex. It happens a lot in business nowadays and the employees end up suffering because of it.

    If the FA genuinely believe she is the best person in the world for the job - then go for it. However, if they are bandying her name around to tick boxes, then that is cruel to her and to England football fans.

    As an aside, I played under a female football manager at Linby Athletic in the 90s for a short time. She had articles in many magazines written about her and I think she was even on TV comparing her to Cherie Lunghi's character, the Manageress. To be honest she was crap and although her husband played for the team and we all knew her well before she took over, it never worked out. There was that 'je ne sais quoi' about the whole situation. Don't get me wrong, I've played under some bad male managers, but don't call me a misandrist for saying it.

    The women's game is nowhere near the level of the man's game - it may be one day, but certainly not in my lifetime and without the legalisation of performance enhancing drugs, I think it would be difficult to get it there.

    It's funny, over here they are really pushing Male Netball. The national team is probably on a par with the women's team, but hardly anyone watches them. Netball is massive in New Zealand (like rugby - don't talk to me about minority sports), but very few self-respecting Kiwi males would pay to watch men play Netball - although they will pay to watch Men play Basketball. It's a funny old world.
    You wrote the best part of a paragraph about the one bad female manager you played for in some detail and then mentioned in passing you had played for several bad male ones. So I think on balance it is probably fair to tag you as a little bit of an accidental misogynist! I hope Sarina gets the job and shows Gareth up for the overly cautious defensively minded manager that he was. If nothing else it would be funny. On the balance of probability the chance of it happening is close to zero but I would definitely have her over any of the other current English managers who could be in line for the job. At least she actually won a final.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    1,606
    Quote Originally Posted by queenslandpie View Post
    So I think on balance it is probably fair to tag you as a little bit of an accidental misogynist!
    You're assuming that because I said that I played for a bad female football manager that I am a misogynist? How the hell do you get that from what I said.

    I also said that because I'd played for a few bad, male managers I wasn't a misandrist.

    My comments were that if someone is appointed to a role because of their $ex, then that is wrong (and I'd find it patronising if I was female).

    If you believe that Wiegman is the best person in the world that the FA could appoint for the England Manager's role, then you are deluded.

    I'm sat here now writing this thinking to myself are you serious or just taking the pi$$.

    Just tell me again how this works, in your mind. Let me ask you a question by the use of an example:

    Your parents own a business and want to retire. You want to take over the business, but you're too young (sorry I am being ageist too in this example) so your family decides to appoint someone to run the business while you grow up, through the business.

    Do they:

    1 - Employ the best person out there to do the job or
    2 - Employ someone on their $ex because people need to be given a chance in life, not because of their ability, but because they are being victimised against due to what $ex they were born.

    Now if you pick the first one - you're a hypocrite. You'd be happy for someone to take an uncalculated risk with their money, but not with your inheritance.

    If you pick the second one - you deserve all you get.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    4,936
    Quote Originally Posted by queenslandpie View Post
    You wrote the best part of a paragraph about the one bad female manager you played for in some detail and then mentioned in passing you had played for several bad male ones. So I think on balance it is probably fair to tag you as a little bit of an accidental misogynist! I hope Sarina gets the job and shows Gareth up for the overly cautious defensively minded manager that he was. If nothing else it would be funny. On the balance of probability the chance of it happening is close to zero but I would definitely have her over any of the other current English managers who could be in line for the job. At least she actually won a final.
    Sarina also lost a major final where England were second best to a Spanish team, and has just scraped through the qualifiers for the next Euros. Funnily enough, I think the women’s team mirrors the men’s one in many ways - plenty of talented individuals, but quite a negative coach. And the one triumph was in a tournament on home soil where the final against Germany could have gone either way.

    Let her carry on doing the job she was hired to do with the women’s team.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    11,871
    Quote Originally Posted by Davy500 View Post
    Was the second goal meaning they would have lost in 90 mins, the fourt goal whent in right at the end so was irrelevant
    Sorry Davy it was the third goal. Peter's scored the second to put us in front before Webber equalised in the 89th minute to make it 2-2. Hurst hit the bar and the ball bounced on the line for the 3rd in extra time.
    I agree with you though we were lucky to be given that goal.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    11,871
    Quote Originally Posted by Davy500 View Post
    In fact other nations specifically germany think its Karma for Engalnds unjustified win in 66 - other nations love Engalnds entitled arragance then laugh when the fans and press throw their toys out of the pram when they lose yet again
    Its the toxity of some Engalnds fans and press - for me it makes no difference who the new Engalnds manager is, it will be the same old rip them to shreds- when will they ever learn and actually get behind their team
    I think Germany got their own back on the Karma bit when Lampards goal was disallowed when it was shown to be a foot over the line. That was right on half time and we would have gone in level at 2-2 after being 2 nil down.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2024
    Posts
    591
    Quote Originally Posted by Davy500 View Post
    No sarcasm people like you are a disgrace - i have said if you dont like it go off and do something else but stop complaining.People loke you are never satisfied unless your moaning
    At least your not like all the others who have come out today and said how great Gareth is, trouble is it was a month to late, they should have been saying these things at the start of the tournament.
    England managers just cant win no matter what they do, Southgate stuck to a system that was very competitive and got us to the later and last stages of a knockout competitions, , in the finals maybe with a bit of luck woould have won it, as England did in 66 .
    Its all very well people saying make subs earlier attack more, funny enough that was our undoing against spain, after equalising we tried to attack, leaving large spaces for spain to exploit as in the player that was allowed to run 60 yards unmarked

    What a sad bigoted comment.
    No one is complaining, merely stating an opinion that is different from your own point of view.
    At least get your facts correct and relevant to the post. Don't make assumptions and research historic events before posting about events 58 years ago.
    I certainly did do other things rather than watch Southgateball. The World Pool Championships were much more entertaining, as the Little Snoring Tiddlywinks tournament would have been.
    You state that England would have won the final if they had any luck. If the manager had gone for the win they may well have done so rather than reverting to type after equalising.
    As for luck , England were very lucky throughout the finals or they wouldn't even have made the final.
    Lucky group stages with no top opponents , a Bellingham strike that most times wouldn't have scored a goal, a very fortunate non penalty v The Netherlands, a delayed one game ban for Bellingham (unlike the 2 goal Turkish goalscorer ) and apparently fortunate late goals to boot in added time.
    Other than Eddie Lowe and Nolan I've never wanted ant manager sacked but footballers and managers are only employees and if not upto the job should be replaced by someone more capable.
    Finally , grow up, and don't make bigoted assumptions on who should support Notts or question their allegiance towards the club.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    7,067
    I went to the paint drying tournament. The speed was something else. Was surprised how quick it was.
    Did you not want Murphy sacked? I remember near the end of his tenure walking out ML due to his clueless tactics & I think attendances were hovering just over 4k on a Saturday

Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •