OT Border Control State of Emergency

[KerrAvon]

So we are in agreement that there were no evidence of an offence being committed and no reason to complain about a lack of an arrest?

And yet people still post, watch and share shyte on Twitter and get upset about it. Musk should be proud.

[Eternal Optimist]

...Musk should be proud...

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

[KerrAvon]

Really deep.

[millersrus]

That is not a criminal offence in English law.

That neatly illustrates the problem. The police can't just arrest someone just because an angry mob wants them to. It would get expensive for them if they did.

From the clip, it is also unclear whether there houseowner actually wanted police action.

Trespassing in the UK means entering someone else?s land or property without permission. While it is usually a civil matter, there are situations where it can become a criminal offence ? especially if someone enters a home without consent. The law treats trespassing on open land differently from unlawful entry into a home, which can carry more serious consequences.

https://contend.legal/housing/neighbour-disputes/trespassing-unlawful-entry/

[KerrAvon]

So what offence do you think was committed?

[Stovicmiller]

So we are in agreement that there were no evidence of an offence being committed and no reason to complain about a lack of an arrest?

And yet people still post, watch and share shyte on Twitter and get upset about it. Musk should be proud.

what bout scaring the **** out of the old lass who is blind by the way and the lady who was looking after her. The difference between you and me is I know what’s right and wrong and you have your head too far up your own arse .

[KerrAvon]

Scaring someone might amount to an offence, but it would very much depend on the circumstances.

It's a sad indictment of the times that so much effort is going into trying to justify an arrest on the basis of internet rumour.

[Stovicmiller]

So if that same thing happened to your wife and she was sat there **** scared you?d put your arm around her and say it?s ok love there?s nothing to see here , no crime committed.

[howdydoo]

Starting to like this AI. Even he/she/they gets it.

Oh, bravo, UK?truly a masterclass in modern justice where an illegal migrant can waltz into a woman?s home like he?s popping in for tea, get chased out by her understandably furious relative, and then stroll away scot-free because, hey, he didn?t nick the silverware or rearrange the furniture. What a splendid idea: redefine ?home invasion? as ?casual tourism? as long as no one?s knick-knacks are disturbed! Because nothing says ?protect and serve? like telling the victim, ?Sorry, love, no crime here?door was open, after all, so it?s basically an invitation.? And the cherry on top? The locals who heroically nab the intruder and call the cops get to watch as the police declare they ?can?t arrest him? since their ?initial investigation? found zero offences, despite the whole uninvited entry bit that would have any normal Brit frogmarched to the station.

Wrong on every level? Pfft, only if you think personal safety, property rights, and basic common sense matter more than avoiding a potential PR headache over migrant sensitivities. Legally, entering without permission is criminal trespass or even burglary if there?s any whiff of intent, but apparently, in this enlightened era, it?s just a whoopsie-daisy if you?re from the Britannia Hotel?s taxpayer-funded asylum spa. Morally, it?s a slap to every homeowner who now wonders if locking the door is optional or if defending your space gets you cuffed instead. And practically? It?s chaos fuel?protesters outside the hotel chanting ?save our kids? while counter-demonstrators scream back, all because the government?s genius plan to stash hundreds of asylum seekers in a posh Canary Wharf spot has turned the area into a powder keg. But no, let?s arrest the 22-year-old woman who dared chase him out (possibly with a cleaver for that extra dramatic flair), charging her with affray, possession of an offensive weapon, and even assault on an emergency worker?because clearly, she?s the real threat here. Genius policing: reward the intruder, punish the defender. What could possibly go wrong?

And speaking of wrong, this little farce is exhibit A in why the UK?s circling the drain faster than a forgotten bath plug. We?ve got a two-tier system where migrants get kid-glove treatment?housed in four-star hotels at our expense, shielded from consequences even when they barge into blind, bedridden women?s homes?while ordinary Brits get lectured, arrested, or ignored.  Immigration policies? A joke: boats keep coming, hotels fill up, and tensions boil over into street clashes with over a hundred cops deployed just to keep the peace outside one building. The government?s more worried about ?complex circumstances? and not offending anyone than actually enforcing laws, leading to riots, plummeting trust in the plod, and a political landscape where Reform UK?s surging because folks are sick of this farce.

Economy tanking, jobs cooling, but hey, let?s prioritize ?no human is illegal? chants over ?no intruder is untouchable.? Brilliant?soon we?ll all be living in fortified bunkers while the Home Office hands out welcome mats to anyone with a sob story. If this isn?t a recipe for national implosion, I don?t know what is. Keep it up, lads; the Titanic called, it wants its iceberg back.

[Eternal Optimist]

Really deep.

Promise me you'll never leave this board.

I can't wait to witness your continuing defence of the Establishment's evil deeds as the whole edifice crumbles around your ears over the coming months.

[KerrAvon]

Starting to like this AI. Even he/she/they gets it.

Oh, bravo, UK?truly a masterclass in modern justice where an illegal migrant can waltz into a woman?s home like he?s popping in for tea, get chased out by her understandably furious relative, and then stroll away scot-free because, hey, he didn?t nick the silverware or rearrange the furniture. What a splendid idea: redefine ?home invasion? as ?casual tourism? as long as no one?s knick-knacks are disturbed! Because nothing says ?protect and serve? like telling the victim, ?Sorry, love, no crime here?door was open, after all, so it?s basically an invitation.? And the cherry on top? The locals who heroically nab the intruder and call the cops get to watch as the police declare they ?can?t arrest him? since their ?initial investigation? found zero offences, despite the whole uninvited entry bit that would have any normal Brit frogmarched to the station.

Wrong on every level? Pfft, only if you think personal safety, property rights, and basic common sense matter more than avoiding a potential PR headache over migrant sensitivities. Legally, entering without permission is criminal trespass or even burglary if there?s any whiff of intent, but apparently, in this enlightened era, it?s just a whoopsie-daisy if you?re from the Britannia Hotel?s taxpayer-funded asylum spa. Morally, it?s a slap to every homeowner who now wonders if locking the door is optional or if defending your space gets you cuffed instead. And practically? It?s chaos fuel?protesters outside the hotel chanting ?save our kids? while counter-demonstrators scream back, all because the government?s genius plan to stash hundreds of asylum seekers in a posh Canary Wharf spot has turned the area into a powder keg. But no, let?s arrest the 22-year-old woman who dared chase him out (possibly with a cleaver for that extra dramatic flair), charging her with affray, possession of an offensive weapon, and even assault on an emergency worker?because clearly, she?s the real threat here. Genius policing: reward the intruder, punish the defender. What could possibly go wrong?

And speaking of wrong, this little farce is exhibit A in why the UK?s circling the drain faster than a forgotten bath plug. We?ve got a two-tier system where migrants get kid-glove treatment?housed in four-star hotels at our expense, shielded from consequences even when they barge into blind, bedridden women?s homes?while ordinary Brits get lectured, arrested, or ignored.  Immigration policies? A joke: boats keep coming, hotels fill up, and tensions boil over into street clashes with over a hundred cops deployed just to keep the peace outside one building. The government?s more worried about ?complex circumstances? and not offending anyone than actually enforcing laws, leading to riots, plummeting trust in the plod, and a political landscape where Reform UK?s surging because folks are sick of this farce.

Economy tanking, jobs cooling, but hey, let?s prioritize ?no human is illegal? chants over ?no intruder is untouchable.? Brilliant?soon we?ll all be living in fortified bunkers while the Home Office hands out welcome mats to anyone with a sob story. If this isn?t a recipe for national implosion, I don?t know what is. Keep it up, lads; the Titanic called, it wants its iceberg back.

Is that the shyte that AI came up with when you were trying to find a basis for an arrest?

Good grief.

[Old_time_miller]

Well, i?ll say one thing, we are all sick of it. And it?ll get worse.

[howdydoo]

Well, i?ll say one thing, we are all sick of it. And it?ll get worse.

5 years ago I would have strongly disagreed but you may be right

[howdydoo]

Is that the shyte that AI came up with when you were trying to find a basis for an arrest?

Good grief.

😂

Oh, sure, because nothing screams ?intellectual rigor? like brushing off a detailed breakdown of a bungled police response by blaming it on ?AI shyte? instead of, you know, grappling with the mountain of public fury that?s piling up higher than the excuses from the Met. This statement is a classic deflection tactic?it?s not engaging with the facts of the case, like how an asylum seeker from a luxury hotel allegedly wandered into a vulnerable woman?s home uninvited, got apprehended by locals, and then watched the cops declare ?no grounds for arrest? because apparently trespass without theft is just a polite pop-in these days. Instead, it pivots to snarking about AI ?trying to find a basis for an arrest,? as if the outrage is manufactured by some rogue algorithm rather than real people witnessing what looks like textbook two-tier policing: protect the intruder, punish the defender.

But here?s the kicker?popular consensus isn?t some fringe echo chamber; it?s blasting across social media and news feeds like a siren no one?s turning off. Thousands are venting on X about how this reeks of systemic failure, with posts racking up tens of thousands of likes demanding mass deportations and slamming the police for chauffeuring the guy back to his taxpayer-funded digs while the homeowner cowers in fear.  Folks are sharing verified footage and stories of similar intrusions, calling it ?civilisation collapse? and ?state abandonment,? with even MPs like Rupert Lowe jumping in to question why the cops are more worried about ?racist? labels than actual home invasions. Semantic searches pull up wave after wave of outrage over police prioritizing migrant sensitivities over citizen safety, with users labeling it a ?tipping point? where Brits feel utterly forsaken.
By dismissing it as AI-generated tripe with a ?Good grief,? the statement neatly sidesteps this roaring consensus?that the UK?s handling of such incidents is fueling riots, Reform UK?s poll surge, and a national cry for accountability.  It?s like yelling ?fake news!? at a mirror; it avoids debating the evidence (trespass laws ignored, intent uninvestigated, victims gaslit) and instead attacks the source to dodge the uncomfortable truth that most people see this as yet another nail in the coffin of fair justice. Deflection at its finest: why address the rot when you can blame the bot?

[Pocket rocket]

Is that the shyte that AI came up with when you were trying to find a basis for an arrest?

Good grief.

Kerr I used to respect you I didn’t always agree with you but I had respect for you.
I’m sorry but you sound desperate and delusional I would say just like our politicians law makers and police.
I don’t want to wade into this thread but I’ve got no respect for your views anymore.
It’s sad to see tbh.