Quote Originally Posted by AraBrian View Post
Think the problem here is a lot of people would agree with goverment that those at most danger of death should be treated first and work it's way down to those least in danger of dying.You will never get everyone to agree though chick's wife works in a school so he thinks teachers should be done before older people guessing he also wants everyone else who works in the schools done also like dinner ladies cleaners janitors matinence people trainee teachers assistants etc.As they can all come into contact with these children who are coming into contact with lots of other children but what about those childrens parents and others who stay in same households as these children they must have at least same chance if not more of being infected by the child than a teacher or any of others working in the school so should all them jump the queue as well?Other people who have members of there family working as bus drivers taxi driver gaurds on trains shop assistants in factorys in offices with others etc etc will probably think their family should jump queue and be done first but everyone can't be done first.I will slag wee nic if I think she is doing wrong but think she is doing this the best way she can.
I know you dont like reading my posts, bit i implore you to read this and tell me what part of the following do you think says its only teachers i want ahead of myself?

So to be clear, my personal opinion is that ALL public facing and high density workplace employees who are ALL facing similar risk levels, should ALL be prioritized ahead of employees who are working from home or at very little risk. And for reasons i have put forward recently, i dont think that is such a hard thing to achieve.

I agree with the government as well, but if it can be done, it should be done.