Quote Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds View Post
Excitement is nothing to do with it.
Video one from street level, simply showed Stokes leaning over the victim, yelling and then waling away.
Video two, from a more raised position, now shows Stokes, putting him on his arse (victim hands in pockets) and then following it up with several blows whilst he is on the ground.

Comparing that, to the Manchester airport video release, is like chalk and cheese.

I think the point of my comment about leaving it to the police and courts, warrents answer. How can someone involved minutely in a riot, be punished so harshly and quickly to score a political point. Yet the 2 incidents mentioned here receive comments about patience for the police and courts?

This guy is an MP, and remembering what I said of how the law works with proportional response. Warrents an immidiate, arrest for charge. The only only contention, is how much provocation occurred to instigate the incident. If he wasn't attacked, he's a dead man walking.
Nice to see you reserving judgement. Can only imagine you’ve never been on a Jury.

Excitement clearly does have something to do with it, hence your complete confusion about four different cases. Thank God it wasn’t a black MP…you’d probably have been orgasmic by now.

Calm down dear…let the law take it from here.