Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

OT Border Control State of Emergency

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by howdydoo View Post
    Some people really believe they're superior.

    I've never met YAK but I'd guess he's witnessed more of the real world than you have in your little East London Utopia. No one launches personal attacks quite like a leftie.

    Shameful post fella.
    Apologies to Yak if my words offended although I suspect they provoked no more than a shrug! However, my admittedly spiky words were provoked somewhat by an accusation that I don't live in the real world. "What's good for the goose..." etc.

    Comment


    • #62
      I’m deeply sceptical about the notion that the state provides laptops for three reasons:

      1. There would be no reason for them to be provided by the state;
      2. If they were provided, GB News, The Daily Mail, The Daily Express and The Sun etc. would be all over it like a rash (they almost certainly bombard the Home Office with FOI requests hoping for bit of red meat that they can throw to their users); and
      3. There are several charities that provide laptops to asylum seekers and other people in need, which wouldn’t be necessary if the state provided them. E.g.

      https://www.charityexcellence.co.uk/...aptop-schemes/ and


      I suspect it’s the activities of charities like that which have entered the social media machine and been morphed into ‘every asylum seeker gets a laptop’ stories for those who want to feel outraged by such things.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by howdydoo View Post
        No one launches personal attacks quite like a leftie.
        If lack of self awareness was an Olympic sport, MillersMad would definitely have its own gold medal winner.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by KerrAvon View Post
          I’m deeply sceptical about the notion that the state provides laptops for three reasons:

          1. There would be no reason for them to be provided by the state;
          2. If they were provided, GB News, The Daily Mail, The Daily Express and The Sun etc. would be all over it like a rash (they almost certainly bombard the Home Office with FOI requests hoping for bit of red meat that they can throw to their users); and
          3. There are several charities that provide laptops to asylum seekers and other people in need, which wouldn’t be necessary if the state provided them. E.g.

          https://www.charityexcellence.co.uk/...aptop-schemes/ and


          I suspect it’s the activities of charities like that which have entered the social media machine and been morphed into ‘every asylum seeker gets a laptop’ stories for those who want to feel outraged by such things.
          And sure has night follows day the other one appears. You two must try harder all very predictably and cute.
          🤣🤣🤣

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by KerrAvon View Post
            If lack of self awareness was an Olympic sport, MillersMad would definitely have its own gold medal winner.
            I've been called worse by better

            Trot on.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Stovicmiller View Post
              Like it?s been said put em in tents and give em **** all , then see how many come.
              Starmer's fantastic deal is we send fifty back a week.Nearly 45000 illegal migrants have come over since this govt.came in,a 50% increase.Macron is just taking the piss and we've got a very very clueless weak leader who bows down to everything.This govt.must be the worst ever we've had.

              Comment


              • #67
                Politicians clearly don't know what to do and much of that is to do with the fact the majority of them are spineless and of the Fake It To Make It demographic .

                Comment


                • #68
                  What would you do about it, animal?

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Around 1000 plus a week comin in at the mo- so the 50 leaves just 950 + to sort !!!

                    Usual pathetic labour response from the most out of touch , useless PM ever !

                    His days are numbered

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by KerrAvon View Post
                      What would you do about it, animal?
                      Leave the European Court Of Human Rights

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        The French have apparently organised an a agreement with Rwanda to send our returnees to there

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by animallittle3 View Post
                          Leave the European Court Of Human Rights
                          I may be corrected here but the British prime minister and the head of justice (quango and mate of prime minister) both made their fortunes challenging and milking this very system. Much of their fortune coming from the purse of the British tax payers.

                          Like I say it could be wrong. I think that it was Starmer that forced the government to change their law whilst the other had great clients like Gerry Adams.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by Grist_To_The_Mill View Post
                            The French have apparently organised an a agreement with Rwanda to send our returnees to there
                            Another hotel filled in Limoges with them.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by animallittle3 View Post
                              Leave the European Court Of Human Rights
                              How would joining Russia and Belarus as non-members stop the boats, animal?

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by frogmiller View Post
                                I may be corrected here but the British prime minister and the head of justice (quango and mate of prime minister) both made their fortunes challenging and milking this very system. Much of their fortune coming from the purse of the British tax payers.

                                Like I say it could be wrong. I think that it was Starmer that forced the government to change their law whilst the other had great clients like Gerry Adams.
                                Two of Starmer's best known cases were representing Lee Clegg, a soldier who had been wrongly convicted of murder in Northern Ireland, and defending two environmental activist who were facing the corporate might of McDonalds in the 'McLibel' case. He did the latter for free

                                I guess that sort of stuff hasn't made its way on to Twitter.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X